Cited by 93Polymer Surface Interaction StudiesLubricants and Their AdditivesTribology and Wear Analysis

Polyelectrolyte brushes: a novel stable lubrication system in aqueous conditions

Kobayashi, Motoyasu, Terada, Masami, Takahara, Atsushi·2012·Faraday Discussions

Abstract

Surface-initiated controlled radical copolymerizations of 2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC), 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyltrimethylammonium chloride) (MTAC), and 3-sulfopropyl methacrylate potassium salt (SPMK) were carried out on a silicon wafer and glass ball to prepare polyelectrolyte brushes with excellent water wettability. The frictional coefficient of the polymer brushes was recorded on a ball-on-plate type tribometer by linear reciprocating motion of the brush specimen at a selected velocity of 1.5 x 10(-3) m s-1 under a normal load of 0.49 N applied to the stationary glass ball (d = 10 mm) at 298 K. The poly(DMAEMA-co-MPC) brush partially cross-linked by bis(2-iodoethoxy)ethane maintained a relatively low friction coefficient around 0.13 under humid air (RH > 75%) even after 200 friction cycles. The poly(SPMK) brush revealed an extremely low friction coefficient around 0.01 even after 450 friction cycles. We supposed that the abrasion of the brush was prevented owing to the good affinity of the poly(SPMK) brush for water forming a water lubrication layer, and electrostatic repulsive interactions among the brushes bearing sulfonic acid groups. Furthermore, the poly(SPMK-co-MTAC) brush with a chemically cross-linked structure showed a stable low friction coefficient in water even after 1400 friction cycles under a normal load of 139 MPa, indicating that the cross-linking structure improved the wear resistance of the brush layer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2fd00123c

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent macroscopic friction studies on pMPC and other hydrated brushes at higher pressures found friction coefficient substantially higher, of order 0.01-0.05.

    “We note also more recent macroscopic friction studies [89, 90] on pMPC and other hydrated brushes, where higher pressures still were accessed, but where the friction coefficient was substantially higher, of order 0.01 - 0.05.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobayashi, M., Terada, M., & Takahara, A.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takahara, Atsushi
Venue
Faraday Discussions
Published
2012
Volume
156
Pages
403
ISSN
  • 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5498
OpenAlex
W2091323588
Cited by
93
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Faraday Discussions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Lubricants and Their Additives
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Tribology and Wear Analysis
Keywords
polyelectrolyte brushes, aqueous lubrication, friction coefficient, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, phosphorylcholine, water wettability, wear resistance, electrostatic repulsion, sulfonic acid groups
MeSH terms
Cross-Linking Reagents, Electrolytes, Ions, Lubrication, Methacrylates, Models, Chemical, Molecular Weight, Phosphorylcholine, Polymers, Potassium, Pressure, Sulfonic Acids, Temperature, Water, Friction, Microscopy, Atomic Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review