The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Giant vesicles as cell models
Abstract
Tremendous progress has been made in recent years in understanding the working of the living cell, including its micro-anatomy, signalling networks, and regulation of genes. However, an understanding of cellular phenomena using fundamental laws starting from first principles is still very far away. Part of the reason is that a cell is an active and exquisitely complex system where every part is linked to the other. Thus, it is difficult or even impossible to design experiments that selectively and exclusively probe a chosen aspect of the cell. Various kinds of idealised systems and cell models have been used to circumvent this problem. An important example is a giant unilamellar vesicle (GUV, also called giant liposome), which provides a cell-sized confined volume to study biochemical reactions as well as self-assembly processes that occur on the membrane. The GUV membrane can be designed suitably to present selected, correctly-oriented cell-membrane proteins, whose mobility is confined to two dimensions. Here, we present recent advances in GUV design and the use of GUVs as cell models that enable quantitative testing leading to insight into the working of real cells. We briefly recapitulate important classical concepts in membrane biophysics emphasising the advantages and limitations of GUVs. We then present results obtained over the last decades using GUVs, choosing the formation of membrane domains and cell adhesion as examples for in-depth treatment. Insight into cell adhesion obtained using micro-interferometry is treated in detail. We conclude by summarising the open questions and possible future directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Environmental sensing through focal adhesions
Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P., & Bershadsky, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2593 · Cited by 2,543
Experimental Models of Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsulation, Growth, and Division
Hanczyc, M. M., Fujikawa, S. M., & Szostak, J. W. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089904 · Cited by 848
The Emergence of Competition Between Model Protocells
Chen, I. A., Roberts, R. W., & Szostak, J. W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100757 · Cited by 435
Habermann, B. (2004) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400105 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Microfluidic methods for forming liposomes
van Swaay, D., & deMello, A. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc41121k · Cited by 379
Octanol-assisted liposome assembly on chip
Deshpande, S., Caspi, Y., Meijering, A. E. C., & Dekker, C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10447 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenz, S. F., & Sengupta, K.
- Venue
- Integrative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 982
- ISSN
- 1757-9694 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-9708
- OpenAlex
- W2051953600
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Giant vesicles as cell models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ib00188h
- The paper
- Fenz, S. F., & Sengupta, K. (2012). Giant vesicles as cell models. Integrative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ib00188h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.