The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A completely in vitro ultrahigh-throughput droplet-based microfluidic screening system for protein engineering and directed evolution
Abstract
In vitro screening systems based on the coupled transcription and translation of genes using cell-free systems have a number of attractive features for protein engineering and directed evolution. We present a completely in vitro ultrahigh-throughput screening platform using droplet-based microfluidics. Single genes are compartmentalized in aqueous droplets, dispersed in inert carrier oil, and amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). After amplification, the droplets, now containing 30,000 copies of each gene, are fused one-to-one with droplets containing a cell-free coupled transcription-translation (IVTT) system and the reagents for a fluorogenic assay. Fluorescence-activated electrocoalescence with an aqueous stream is then used to selectively recover genes from droplets containing the desired activity. We demonstrate, by selecting mixtures of lacZ genes encoding the enzyme β-galactosidase and lacZmut genes encoding an inactive variant, that this system can sort at 2000 droplets s(-1): lacZ genes were enriched 502-fold from a 1 : 100 molar ratio of lacZ : lacZmut genes. Indeed, the false positive and false negative error rates were both <0.004 and the results indicate that enrichment is not limited by the sorting efficiency, but by the co-encapsulation of multiple genes in droplets, which is described by the Poisson distribution. Compared to screening using microtiter plate-based systems, the volume and cost of PCR and IVTT reagents are reduced by almost 10(5)-fold, allowing the screening of 10(6) genes using only 150 μL of reagents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts
Turner, N. J. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.203 · Cited by 785
Millisecond Kinetics on a Microfluidic Chip Using Nanoliters of Reagents
Song, H., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0354566 · Cited by 693
Cited by
Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications
Silverman, A. D., Karim, A. S., & Jewett, M. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0186-3 · Cited by 593
The All E. coli TX-TL Toolbox 2.0: A Platform for Cell-Free Synthetic Biology
Garamella, J., Marshall, R., Rustad, M., & Noireaux, V. (2016) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00296 · Cited by 419
Currin, A., Swainston, N., Day, P. J., & Kell, D. B. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00351a · Cited by 388
Advances in ultrahigh-throughput screening for directed enzyme evolution
Markel, U., Essani, K. D., Besirlioglu, V., Schiffels, J., Streit, W. R., & Schwaneberg, U. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00981c · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Fallah-Araghi, A., Baret, J.-C., Ryckelynck, M., & Griffiths, A. D.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 882
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W1998857762
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.