Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA

Ballabio, Davide, Consonni, Viviana·2013·Analytical Methods

Abstract

The common steps to calibrate and validate classification models based on partial least squares discriminant analysis are discussed in the present tutorial. All issues to be evaluated during model training and validation are introduced and explained using a chemical dataset, composed of toxic and non-toxic sediment samples. The analysis was carried out with MATLAB routines, which are available in the ESI of this tutorial, together with the dataset and a detailed list of all MATLAB instructions used for the analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3ay40582f

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 1,255

Metadata

Authors
Ballabio, D., & Consonni, V.
Venue
Analytical Methods
Published
2013
Volume
5
Issue
16
Pages
3790
ISSN
  • 1759-9660 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-9679
OpenAlex
W1970458547
Cited by
1,255
References
6
FWCI
32.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ay40582f
The paper
Ballabio, D., & Consonni, V. (2013). Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA. Analytical Methods. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay40582f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.