The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries – a review
Abstract
This review is an attempt to report the latest development in lithium-sulfur batteries, namely the storage system that, due to its potential energy content, is presently attracting considerable attention both for automotive and stationary storage applications. We show here that consistent progress has been achieved, to the point that this battery is now considered to be near to industrial production. However, the performance of present lithium-sulfur batteries is still far from meeting their real energy density potentiality. Thus, the considerable breakthroughs so far achieved are outlined in this review as the basis for additional R&D, with related important results, which are expected to occur in the next few years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Self-citation
Cited by
Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes
Manthiram, A., Yu, X., & Wang, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 · Cited by 4,689
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201405115 · Cited by 1,620
Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Mechanism and Kinetics of Li2S Precipitation in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Fan, F. Y., Carter, W. C., & Chiang, Y. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201501559 · Cited by 987
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresser, D., Passerini, S., & Scrosati, B.
- Venue
- Chemical Communications
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 90
- Pages
- 10545
- ISSN
- 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2093211524
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cc46131a
- The paper
- Bresser, D., Passerini, S., & Scrosati, B. (2013). Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries – a review. Chemical Communications. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46131a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
