The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
Abstract
Development of advanced energy‐storage systems for portable devices, electric vehicles, and grid storage must fulfill several requirements: low‐cost, long life, acceptable safety, high energy, high power, and environmental benignity. With these requirements, lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries promise great potential to be the next‐generation high‐energy system. However, the practicality of Li–S technology is hindered by technical obstacles, such as short shelf and cycle life and low sulfur content/loading, arising from the shuttling of polysulfide intermediates between the cathode and anode and the poor electronic conductivity of S and the discharge product Li 2 S. Much progress has been made during the past five years to circumvent these problems by employing sulfur–carbon or sulfur–polymer composite cathodes, novel cell configurations, and lithium‐metal anode stabilization. This Progress Report highlights recent developments with special attention toward innovation in sulfur‐encapsulation techniques, development of novel materials, and cell‐component design. The scientific understanding and engineering concerns are discussed at the end in every developmental stage. The critical research directions needed and the remaining challenges to be addressed are summarized in the Conclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
The rechargeable revolution: a better battery
Van Noorden, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/507026a · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additives to Render Uniform Li Deposits in Lithium Metal Batteries
Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201605989 · Cited by 1,699
Insights into Biochar and Hydrochar Production and Applications: A Review
Zhang, Z., Zhu, Z., Shen, B., & Liu, L. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035 · Cited by 687
Lithium Bond Chemistry in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Hou, T., Xu, W., Chen, X., Peng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201704324 · Cited by 574
Review: carbon onions for electrochemical energy storage
Zeiger, M., Jäckel, N., Mochalin, V. N., & Presser, V. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta08295a · Cited by 474
Progress and Perspective of Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Lei, D., Shi, K., Ye, H., Wan, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, L., Li, B., Yang, Q., Kang, F., & He, Y. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707570 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1980-2006
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2115659326
- Cited by
- 1,620
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 85.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201405115
- The paper
- Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C. (2015). Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.