The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficient immobilisation of industrial biocatalysts: criteria and constraints for the selection of organic polymeric carriers and immobilisation methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Although enzyme use in dye degradation specifically can be quite effective under laboratory conditions, their application to an industrial scale has many limitations, mainly due to the production cost (culture, isolation, equipment) and operational cost (use/reuse, downstream processing) of the enzymes 29, 112, 156-158 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [156]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
- Christensen, 2003, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 105, 318, 10.1002/ejlt.200390062 · DOI
- Hasan, 2006, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 235, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.016 · DOI
- Kirk, 2002, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 13, 345, 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2 · DOI
- Thomas, 2002, Trends Biotechnol., 20, 238, 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01935-2 · DOI
- Tischer, 1999, Trends Biotechnol., 17, 326, 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01322-0 · DOI
- Petry, 2006, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 95, 984, 10.1002/bit.21074 · DOI
- Pierre, 2004, Biocatal. Biotransform., 22, 145, 10.1080/10242420412331283314 · DOI
- Betancor, 2008, Trends Biotechnol., 26, 566, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.06.009 · DOI
- Nikolova, 1993, J. Ind. Microbiol., 12, 76, 10.1007/BF01569905 · DOI
- Fidaleo, 2006, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 95, 446, 10.1002/bit.21051 · DOI
- Sheldon, 2011, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 92, 467, 10.1007/s00253-011-3554-2 · DOI
- Hanefeld, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 453, 10.1039/B711564B · DOI · Paper page
- Basso, 2000, Chem. Commun., 467, 10.1039/b000797h · DOI
- Khan, 2010, Res. J. Biol. Sci., 5, 565, 10.3923/rjbsci.2010.565.575 · DOI · Paper page
- Basso, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 877, 10.1002/adsc.200600337 · DOI
- Ferrario, 2011, Adv. Synth. Catal., 353, 2466, 10.1002/adsc.201100397 · DOI
- Petkar, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 39, 83, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.01.034 · DOI
- Kirk, 2002, Org. Process Res. Dev., 6, 446, 10.1021/op0200165 · DOI
- Mei, 2003, Biomacromolecules, 4, 70, 10.1021/bm025611t · DOI
- Salis, 2003, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 24–25, 75, 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00112-7 · DOI
- Mateo, 2003, Biomacromolecules, 4, 772, 10.1021/bm0257661 · DOI
- Tosa, 1966, Enzymologia, 31, 214
- Goldstein, 1972, Biochemistry, 11, 4072, 10.1021/bi00772a009 · DOI
- Karboune, 2005, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 32, 175, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.11.001 · DOI
- Porath, 1992, Protein Expression Purif., 3, 263, 10.1016/1046-5928(92)90001-D · DOI
- Cassimjee, 2008, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 99, 712, 10.1002/bit.21587 · DOI
- Katchalski-Katzir, 2000, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 10, 157, 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00124-7 · DOI
- Kallenberg, 2005, Adv. Synth. Catal., 347, 905, 10.1002/adsc.200505042 · DOI
- Takata, 1978, J. Solid-Phase Biochem., 2, 225, 10.1007/BF02996744 · DOI
- Fernandez-Lafuente, 1992, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 14, 489, 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90143-C · DOI
- Katwa, 1983, Biotechnol. Lett., 3, 191, 10.1007/BF00131901 · DOI
- Martin, 2002, Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 39, 229
- Gemeiner, 1993, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 15, 551, 10.1016/0141-0229(93)90017-V · DOI
- Hilterhaus, 2008, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 31, 163, 10.1007/s00449-008-0199-3 · DOI
- Wiemann, 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 617, 10.1021/op9000059 · DOI
- Petry, 2006, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 95, 984, 10.1002/bit.21074 · DOI
- Basso, 2010, Biotechnol. Prog., 26, 397, 10.1002/btpr.334 · DOI
- Ricca, 2010, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 1180, 10.3390/ijms11031180 · DOI
- Halling, 1994, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 16, 178, 10.1016/0141-0229(94)90043-4 · DOI
- Basso, 2001, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 11, 851, 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00070-9 · DOI
- Gardossi, 2010, Trends Biotechnol., 28, 171, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.01.001 · DOI
- The EFB Working Party on Immobilised Biocatalysts, 1983, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 5, 304, 10.1016/0141-0229(83)90082-0 · DOI
- van Roon, 2006, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 72, 263, 10.1007/s00253-005-0247-8 · DOI
- Braiuca, 2006, Trends Biotechnol., 24, 419, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.07.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Pellis, A., Herrero Acero, E., Gardossi, L., Ferrario, V., & Guebitz, G. M. (2016) · Polymer International · doi:10.1002/pi.5087 · Cited by 151
Self-citationEl-Sheekh, M. M., El-Kassas, H. Y., & Ali, S. S. (2025) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-024-02638-0 · Cited by 86
Nano-in-Nano Approach for Enzyme Immobilization Based on Block Copolymers
Auriemma, F., De Rosa, C., Malafronte, A., Di Girolamo, R., Santillo, C., Gerelli, Y., Fragneto, G., Barker, R., Pavone, V., Maglio, O., et al. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b08959 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantone, S., Ferrario, V., Corici, L., Ebert, C., Fattor, D., Spizzo, P., & Gardossi, L.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6262
- ISSN
- 0306-0012
- 1460-4744
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review