The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of synthetic accessibility on the commercial viability of organic photovoltaics
Abstract
For organic photovoltaics (OPVs) to become a viable source of renewable energy, the synthesis of organic active-layer materials will need to be scaled to thousands of kilograms. Additionally, the ultimate cost of these materials will need to be low enough to constitute only a small fraction of the cost of the solar cell module. In this study, we present a quantitative analysis, based on published small-scale synthetic procedures, to estimate the materials costs for several promising OPV materials when produced in large quantities. The cost in dollars-per-gram ($ per g) is found to increase linearly with the number of synthetic steps required to produce each organic photoactive compound. We estimate the cost-per-Watt ($ per Wp) as a function of power conversion efficiency (PCE) for an archetypal OPV structure and find that a relatively simple molecule requiring only 3 synthetic steps will contribute a cost of 0.001 to 0.01 $ per Wp, given a solar module PCE of 10%. In contrast, a relatively complicated molecule requiring 14 synthetic steps will contribute costs in the range of 0.075 to 0.48 $ per Wp. Our findings suggest that the commercial viability of an OPV technology may depend on the synthetic accessibility of its constituent active layer materials. Additionally, this work stresses the importance of optimizing synthetic routes to minimize solvent and reagent usage as well as to minimize the number of required workup procedures in the scaled production of OPV materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matsuo, Y., Sato, Y., Niinomi, T., Soga, I., Tanaka, H., & Nakamura, E. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9048702 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Efficient, stable and scalable perovskite solar cells using poly(3-hexylthiophene)
Jung, E. H., Jeon, N. J., Park, E. Y., Moon, C. S., Shin, T. J., Yang, T.-Y., Noh, J. H., & Seo, J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1036-3 · Cited by 2,305
Molecular Materials for Organic Photovoltaics: Small is Beautiful
Roncali, J., Leriche, P., & Blanchard, P. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201305999 · Cited by 586
Advantages, challenges and molecular design of different material types used in organic solar cells
Yi, J., Zhang, G., Yu, H., & Yan, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00618-1 · Cited by 522
Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells
Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201602242 · Cited by 414
Eftaiha, A. F., Sun, J.-P., Hill, I. G., & Welch, G. C. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c3ta14236a · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Osedach, T. P., Andrew, T. L., & Bulović, V.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 711
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2170342251
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.