The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionic shield for polysulfides towards highly-stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur batteries attract great attention due to their high energy density, while their real applications are still hindered by the rapid capacity degradation. Despite great efforts devoted to solving the polysulfide shuttle between the cathode and anode electrodes, it remains a serious challenge to build highly-stable lithium–sulfur batteries. Herein we demonstrate a strategy of introducing an ion selective membrane to improve the stability and coulombic efficiency of lithium–sulfur batteries. The sulfonate-ended perfluoroalkyl ether groups on the ionic separators are connected by pores or channels that are around several nanometers in size. These SO3− groups-coated channels allow ion hopping of positively charged species (Li+) but reject hopping of negative ions, such as polysulfide anions (Sn2−) in this specific case due to the coulombic interactions. Consequently, this cation permselective membrane acts as an electrostatic shield for polysulfide anions, and confines the polysulfides on the cathode side. An ultra-low decay rate of 0.08% per cycle is achieved within the initial 500 cycles for the membrane developed in this work, which is less than half that of the routine membranes. Such an ion selective membrane is versatile for various electrodes and working conditions, which is promising for the construction of high performance batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes
Manthiram, A., Yu, X., & Wang, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 · Cited by 4,689
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationLithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201405115 · Cited by 1,620
Designing polymers for advanced battery chemistries
Lopez, J., Mackanic, D. G., Cui, Y., & Bao, Z. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0103-6 · Cited by 894
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q., Peng, H.-J., Liu, X.-Y., Qian, W.-Z., & Wei, F.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 347-353
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2134392863
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic shield for polysulfides towards highly-stable lithium–sulfur batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee42223b
- The paper
- Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q., Peng, H.-J., Liu, X.-Y., Qian, W.-Z., & Wei, F. (2014). Ionic shield for polysulfides towards highly-stable lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42223b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.