The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices
Abstract
Dipstick and lateral-flow formats have dominated rapid diagnostics over the last three decades. These formats gained popularity in the consumer markets due to their compactness, portability and facile interpretation without external instrumentation. However, lack of quantitation in measurements has challenged the demand of existing assay formats in consumer markets. Recently, paper-based microfluidics has emerged as a multiplexable point-of-care platform which might transcend the capabilities of existing assays in resource-limited settings. However, paper-based microfluidics can enable fluid handling and quantitative analysis for potential applications in healthcare, veterinary medicine, environmental monitoring and food safety. Currently, in its early development stages, paper-based microfluidics is considered a low-cost, lightweight, and disposable technology. The aim of this review is to discuss: (1) fabrication of paper-based microfluidic devices, (2) functionalisation of microfluidic components to increase the capabilities and the performance, (3) introduction of existing detection techniques to the paper platform and (4) exploration of extracting quantitative readouts via handheld devices and camera phones. Additionally, this review includes challenges to scaling up, commercialisation and regulatory issues. The factors which limit paper-based microfluidic devices to become real world products and future directions are also identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Allegranzi, B., Nejad, S. B., Combescure, C., Graafmans, W., Attar, H., Donaldson, L., & Pittet, D. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61458-4 · Cited by 2,514
Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world
Peeling, R. W., & Mabey, D. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03279.x · Cited by 500
Integrated rapid-diagnostic-test reader platform on a cellphone
Mudanyali, O., Dimitrov, S., Sikora, U., Padmanabhan, S., Navruz, I., & Ozcan, A. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40235a · Cited by 426
Cited by
Yetisen, A. K., Qu, H., Manbachi, A., Butt, H., Dokmeci, M. R., Hinestroza, J. P., Skorobogatiy, M., Khademhosseini, A., & Yun, S. H. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b08176 · Cited by 752
Self-citationContact Lens Sensors in Ocular Diagnostics
Farandos, N. M., Yetisen, A. K., Monteiro, M. J., Lowe, C. R., & Yun, S. H. (2015) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201400504 · Cited by 466
Self-citationCommercialization of microfluidic devices
Volpatti, L. R., & Yetisen, A. K. (2014) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.010 · Cited by 432
Self-citationTsao, C.-W. (2016) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi7120225 · Cited by 367
Beyond the lateral flow assay: A review of paper-based microfluidics
Carrell, C., Kava, A., Nguyen, M., Menger, R., Munshi, Z., Call, Z., Nussbaum, M., & Henry, C. (2019) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2018.12.002 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Yetisen, A. K., Akram, M. S., & Lowe, C. R.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2210
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2040080388
- Cited by
- 1,943
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 100.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3lc50169h
- The paper
- Yetisen, A. K., Akram, M. S., & Lowe, C. R. (2013). Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50169h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.