The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer Microfluidics: Simple, Low-Cost Fabrication Process Bridging Academic Lab Research to Commercialized Production
Open accessAbstract
Using polymer materials to fabricate microfluidic devices provides simple, cost effective, and disposal advantages for both lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices and micro total analysis systems (μTAS). Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer and thermoplastics are the two major polymer materials used in microfluidics. The fabrication of PDMS and thermoplastic microfluidic device can be categorized as front-end polymer microchannel fabrication and post-end microfluidic bonding procedures, respectively. PDMS and thermoplastic materials each have unique advantages and their use is indispensable in polymer microfluidics. Therefore, the proper selection of polymer microfabrication is necessary for the successful application of microfluidics. In this paper, we give a short overview of polymer microfabrication methods for microfluidics and discuss current challenges and future opportunities for research in polymer microfluidics fabrication. We summarize standard approaches, as well as state-of-art polymer microfluidic fabrication methods. Currently, the polymer microfluidic device is at the stage of technology transition from research labs to commercial production. Thus, critical consideration is also required with respect to the commercialization aspects of fabricating polymer microfluidics. This article provides easy-to-understand illustrations and targets to assist the research community in selecting proper polymer microfabrication strategies in microfluidics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Materials Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 · Cited by 4,611
Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1998) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19980316)37:5<550::aid-anie550>3.0.co;2-g · Cited by 4,285
Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography
Unger, M. A., Chou, H.-P., Thorsen, T., Scherer, A., & Quake, S. R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.113 · Cited by 4,010
Miniaturized total chemical analysis systems: A novel concept for chemical sensing
Manz, A., Graber, N., & Widmer, H. M. (1990) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/0925-4005(90)80209-i · Cited by 3,122
Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices
McDonald, J. C., & Whitesides, G. M. (2002) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar010110q · Cited by 2,454
Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices
Yetisen, A. K., Akram, M. S., & Lowe, C. R. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50169h · Cited by 1,943
Microfluidic devices fabricated in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies
Sia, S. K., & Whitesides, G. M. (2003) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200305584 · Cited by 1,717
Becker, H. (2002) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/s0039-9140(01)00594-x · Cited by 1,187
Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
Advances in Microfluidic Materials, Functions, Integration, and Applications
Nge, P. N., Rogers, C. I., & Woolley, A. T. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300337x · Cited by 958
Cited by
High-throughput organ-on-a-chip systems: Current status and remaining challenges
Probst, C., Schneider, S., & Loskill, P. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cobme.2018.02.004 · Cited by 171
Organs-on-a-chip: a union of tissue engineering and microfabrication
Zhao, Y., Wang, E. Y., Lai, F. B. L., Cheung, K., & Radisic, M. (2023) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.018 · Cited by 93
The revolution of PDMS microfluidics in cellular biology
Banik, S., Uchil, A., Kalsang, T., Chakrabarty, S., Ali, M. A., Srisungsitthisunti, P., Mahato, K. K., Surdo, S., & Mazumder, N. (2023) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2034733 · Cited by 84
Rahul, R., Prasad, N., Mini, R. S., & Ranjith, S. K. (2025) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d5lc00546a · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsao, C.-W.
- Venue
- Micromachines
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-12-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 2072-666X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2562178559
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer Microfluidics: Simple, Low-Cost Fabrication Process Bridging Academic Lab Research to Commercialized Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/mi7120225
- The paper
- Tsao, C.-W. (2016). Polymer Microfluidics: Simple, Low-Cost Fabrication Process Bridging Academic Lab Research to Commercialized Production. Micromachines. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7120225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.