The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trials and tribulations of ‘omics data analysis: assessing quality of SIMCA-based multivariate models using examples from pulmonary medicine
Open accessAbstract
Respiratory diseases are multifactorial heterogeneous diseases that have proved recalcitrant to understanding using focused molecular techniques. This trend has led to the rise of ‘omics approaches (e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics) and subsequent acquisition of large-scale datasets consisting of multiple variables. In ‘omics technology-based investigations, discrepancies between the number of variables analyzed (e.g., mRNA, proteins, metabolites) and the number of study subjects constitutes a major statistical challenge. The application of traditional univariate statistical methods (e.g., t-test) to these “short-and-wide” datasets may result in high numbers of false positives, while the predominant approach of p-value correction to account for these high false positive rates (e.g., FDR, Bonferroni) are associated with significant losses in statistical power. In other words, the benefit in decreased false positives must be counterbalanced with a concomitant loss in true positives. As an alternative, multivariate statistical analysis (MVA) is increasingly being employed to cope with ‘omics-based data structures. When properly applied, MVA approaches can be powerful tools for integration and interpretation of complex ‘omics-based datasets towards the goal of identifying biomarkers and/or subphenotypes. However, MVA methods are also prone to over-interpretation and misuse. A common software used in biomedical research to perform MVA-based analyses is the SIMCA package, which includes multiple MVA methods. In this opinion piece, we propose guidelines for minimum reporting standards for a SIMCA-based workflow, in terms of data preprocessing (e.g., normalization, scaling) and model statistics (number of components, R2, Q2, and CV-ANOVA p-value). Examples of these applications in recent COPD and asthma studies are provided. It is expected that readers will gain an increased understanding of the power and utility of MVA methods for applications in biomedical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
Miller, R. G. (1981) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8 · Cited by 5,604
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Storey, J. D. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 · Cited by 5,603
Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS)
Trygg, J., & Wold, S. (2002) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.695 · Cited by 2,447
A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias
Nakagawa, S. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arh107 · Cited by 2,097
Things I have learned (so far).
Cohen, J. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.12.1304 · Cited by 1,781
Teoria Statistica Delle Classi e Calcolo Delle Probabilità
(2010) · Encyclopedia of Research Design · doi:10.4135/9781412961288.n455 · Cited by 1,698
The global burden of disease, 1990–2020
Lopez, A. D., & Murray, C. C. J. L. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/3218 · Cited by 1,614
Ten Years of Pathway Analysis: Current Approaches and Outstanding Challenges
Khatri, P., Sirota, M., & Butte, A. J. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375 · Cited by 1,566
Cited by
Jašarević, E., Howerton, C. L., Howard, C. D., & Bale, T. L. (2015) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2015-1177 · Cited by 329
Promises and pitfalls of untargeted metabolomics
Gertsman, I., & Barshop, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1007/s10545-017-0130-7 · Cited by 271
Bäckryd, E., Persson, E. B., Larsson, A. I., Fischer, M. R., & Gerdle, B. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192623 · Cited by 75
Gerdle, B., Bäckryd, E., Falkenberg, T., Lundström, E., & Ghafouri, B. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2019-0088 · Cited by 22
Osakunor, D. N. M., Mduluza, T., Osei-Hyiaman, D., Burgess, K., Woolhouse, M. E. J., & Mutapi, F. (2020) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008866 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheelock, Å. M., & Wheelock, C. E.
- Venue
- Molecular BioSystems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2589-2596
- ISSN
- 1742-2051 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-206X
- OpenAlex
- W2152611039
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trials and tribulations of ‘omics data analysis: assessing quality of SIMCA-based multivariate models using examples from pulmonary medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3mb70194h
- The paper
- Wheelock, Å. M., & Wheelock, C. E. (2013). Trials and tribulations of ‘omics data analysis: assessing quality of SIMCA-based multivariate models using examples from pulmonary medicine. Molecular BioSystems. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3mb70194h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.