Cited by 75Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Chronic pain patients can be classified into four groups: clustering-based discriminant analysis of psychometric data from 4665 patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain centre (a SQRP study)

Open access
Bäckryd, Emmanuel, Persson, Elisabeth B., Larsson, Annelie Inghilesi, Fischer, Marcelo Rivano, Gerdle, Björn·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To subgroup chronic pain patients using psychometric data and regress the variables most responsible for subgroup discrimination. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, registry-based study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Chronic pain patients assessed at a multidisciplinary pain centre between 2008 and 2015. METHODS: Data from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP) were retrieved and analysed by principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering analysis, and partial least squares-discriminant analysis. RESULTS: Four subgroups were identified. Group 1 was characterized by low "psychological strain", the best relative situation concerning pain characteristics (intensity and spreading), the lowest frequency of fibromyalgia, as well as by a slightly older age. Group 2 was characterized by high "psychological strain" and by the most negative situation with respect to pain characteristics (intensity and spreading). Group 3 was characterized by high "social distress", the longest pain durations, and a statistically higher frequency of females. The frequency of three neuropathic pain conditions was generally lower in this group. Group 4 was characterized by high psychological strain, low "social distress", and high pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of these four clusters of chronic pain patients could be useful for the development of personalized rehabilitation programs. For example, the identification of a subgroup characterized mainly by high perceived "social distress" raises the question of how to best design interventions for such patients. Differentiating between clinically important subgroups and comparing how these subgroups respond to interventions is arguably an important area for further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0192623

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All three bio-psycho-social components are important in chronic pain, and different constellations of these components form subgroups with different needs in pain treatment, indicating the need to design tailor-made interventions.

    “Research confirms that all three components–bio-psycho-social–are important in chronic pain, but different constellations of these components form subgroups with different needs in pain treatment and indicate the need to design “tailor-made” interventions (Bäckryd et al., 2018).”

    From The Development of Mindful-Based Dance Movement Therapy Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Pilot Study With Chronic Headache Patients (2021) · cites this paper as Bäckryd et al., 2018

    The Introduction describes physical, psychological, and social influences on chronic pain, and the Discussion identifies four groups with different pain, psychological, and social characteristics. The Discussion also proposes personalized interventions, but explicitly calls the proposed treatments for particular groups “highly speculative”; it does not establish that the groups have different treatment needs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Bennett M, Closs S. Methodological issues in nonpharamacological trials for chronic pain. Pain Clinical Updates. 2010; 18: 1– 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bäckryd, E., Persson, E. B., Larsson, A. I., Fischer, M. R., & Gerdle, B.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bäckryd, Emmanuel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e0192623
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787552463
Cited by
75
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AFA Försäkring
  • research-ALF Linköping University hospital
  • Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, patient subgroups, psychological strain, social distress, pain intensity, fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, pain duration, multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation, personalized rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Sweden, Cluster Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Patient Satisfaction, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review