The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silver nanoparticles: a novel radiation sensitizer for glioma?
Abstract
Malignant gliomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors with a dismal prognosis. Previous investigations by our group demonstrated the radiosensitizing effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on glioma cells in vitro. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intratumoral administration of AgNPs in combination with a single dose of ionizing radiation at clinically relevant MV energies for the treatment of C6 glioma-bearing rats. AgNPs (10 or 20 μg/10 μl) were stereotactically administered on day 8 after tumor implantation. One day after AgNP injection, rats bearing glioma received 10 Gy radiation. The mean survival times were 100.5 and 98 days, the corresponding percent increase in life spans was 513.2% and 497.7%, and the cure rates were 41.7 and 38.5% at 200 days for the 10 and 20 μg AgNPs and radiation combination groups, respectively. In contrast, the mean survival times for irradiated controls, 10 and 20 μg AgNPs alone, and untreated controls were 24.5, 16.1, 19.4, and 16.4 days, respectively. Furthermore, a cooperative antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect was obtained when gliomas were treated with AgNPs followed by radiotherapy. Our results showed the therapeutic efficacy of AgNPs in combination with radiotherapy without apparent systemic toxicity, suggesting the clinical potential of AgNPs in improving the outcome of malignant glioma radiotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807
Cited by
Zhang, X.-F., Liu, Z.-G., Shen, W., & Gurunathan, S. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17091534 · Cited by 3,220
Emerging Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials for Cancer Radiation Therapy
Song, G., Cheng, L., Chao, Y., Yang, K., & Liu, Z. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700996 · Cited by 771
Platinum nanoparticles in nanobiomedicine
Pedone, D., Moglianetti, M., De Luca, E., Bardi, G., & Pompa, P. P. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00152e · Cited by 454
Nanoparticles for Radiation Therapy Enhancement: the Key Parameters
Retif, P., Pinel, S., Toussaint, M., Frochot, C., Chouikrat, R., Bastogne, T., & Barberi-Heyob, M. (2015) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.11642 · Cited by 385
Recent advances in metal nanoparticles in cancer therapy
Sharma, A., Goyal, A. K., & Rath, G. (2018) · Journal of Drug Targeting · doi:10.1080/1061186x.2017.1400553 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, P., Huang, Z., Chen, Z., Xu, R., Wu, H., Zang, F., Wang, C., & Gu, N.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 11829
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2096814257
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.