The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three-dimensional macroporous graphene architectures as high performance electrodes for capacitive deionization
Abstract
In order to obtain excellent desalination behavior during the capacitive deionization (CDI) process, electrodes should provide efficient pathways for ion and electron transport. Here we open up a new opportunity to prepare high performance capacitive deionization (CDI) electrodes based on three-dimensional macroporous graphene architectures (3DMGA). The 3DMGA were fabricated by a simple template-directed method using polystyrene microspheres as sacrificial templates. The resulting 3DMGA exhibited a 3D interconnected structure with large specific surface area and high electric conductivity. The electrochemical behavior of the 3DMGA electrodes was analyzed by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge–discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. It was found that the 3DMGA showed superiority in electrosorption capacitance, low inner resistance, high reversibility and excellent stability. The power and energy density analysis further demonstrated that the 3DMGA electrode had a higher power output and lower energy consumption. According to the electrochemical measurements, the 3DMGA is quite desirable for high performance and low energy consumption capacitive deionization. The desalination capacity was evaluated by a batch mode electrosorptive experiment in a NaCl aqueous solution. An excellent desalination behavior of the 3DMGA was obtained due to the large accessible surface area, high electric conductivity and unique 3D interconnected macroporous structure. The 3DMGA was confirmed to be a promising material for CDI application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials
Perreault, F., Fonseca de Faria, A., & Elimelech, M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00021a · Cited by 1,528
3D Graphene‐Based H2‐Production Photocatalyst and Electrocatalyst
Kuang, P., Sayed, M., Fan, J., Cheng, B., & Yu, J. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903802 · Cited by 302
Energy Efficiency of Capacitive Deionization
Wang, L., Dykstra, J. E., & Lin, S. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04858 · Cited by 292
Zhuo, H., Hu, Y., Tong, X., Zhong, L., Peng, X., & Sun, R. (2016) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.041 · Cited by 196
Review of Concepts and Applications of Electrochemical Ion Separation (EIONS) Process
Yoon, H., Lee, J., Kim, S., & Yoon, J. (2019) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.071 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Zhang, D., Yan, T., Wen, X., Zhang, J., Shi, L., & Zhong, Q.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 11778
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W2127690298
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional macroporous graphene architectures as high performance electrodes for capacitive deionization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ta11926b
- The paper
- Wang, H., Zhang, D., Yan, T., Wen, X., Zhang, J., Shi, L., & Zhong, Q. (2013). Three-dimensional macroporous graphene architectures as high performance electrodes for capacitive deionization. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11926b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.