The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct comparison of a covalently-linked dyad and a 1 : 1 mixture of tetrabenzoporphyrin and fullerene as organic photovoltaic materials
Open accessAbstract
A p-i-n organic photovoltaic cell with tetrabenzoporphyrin (BP), a BP-C₆₀ dyad and PCBM for the p-, i- and n-layers, respectively, gave a better fill factor and power conversion efficiency than the corresponding p-i-n cell having a 1:1 blend film of BP and PCBM as the i-layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the PL of porphyrin could be successfully quenched by C60, and photo-induced electron transfer could be observed.”
From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Not surprisingly, it showed a relatively low e ffi ciency (0.15%).”
From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matsuo, Y., Sato, Y., Niinomi, T., Soga, I., Tanaka, H., & Nakamura, E. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9048702 · Cited by 488
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Brabec, 2001, Adv. Funct. Mater., 11, 15, 10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
- Coakley, 2004, Chem. Mater., 16, 4533, 10.1021/cm049654n · DOI
- Beaujuge, 2011, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 20009, 10.1021/ja2073643 · DOI
- Kaltenbrunner, 2012, Nat. Commun., 3, 770, 10.1038/ncomms1772 · DOI
- Walker, 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 3063, 10.1002/adfm.200900832 · DOI
- Roncali, 2009, Acc. Chem. Res., 42, 1719, 10.1021/ar900041b · DOI
- Walker, 2011, Chem. Mater., 23, 470, 10.1021/cm102189g · DOI
- Mishra, 2012, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51, 2020, 10.1002/anie.201102326 · DOI · Paper page
- Gust, 1993, Acc. Chem. Res., 26, 198, 10.1021/ar00028a010 · DOI
- Wasielewski, 1992, Chem. Rev., 92, 435, 10.1021/cr00011a005 · DOI
- Osuka, 1997, Pure Appl. Chem., 69, 797, 10.1351/pac199769040797 · DOI
- Imahori, 1997, Adv. Mater., 9, 537, 10.1002/adma.19970090704 · DOI
- Segura, 2005, Chem. Soc. Rev., 34, 31, 10.1039/B402417F · DOI
- Wang, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 24297, 10.1039/c2jm33756h · DOI
- Imahori, 2012, Chem. Commun., 48, 4032, 10.1039/c2cc30621b · DOI
- Ito, 1998, Chem. Commun., 1661, 10.1039/a803656j · DOI
- Yamada, 2008, Chem. Commun., 2957, 10.1039/b719964c · DOI
- Saeki, 2013, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 52, 111601, 10.7567/JJAP.52.111601 · DOI
- Saeki, 2013, Appl. Phys. Express, 6, 035601, 10.7567/APEX.6.035601 · DOI
- Guide, 2011, Adv. Mater., 23, 2313, 10.1002/adma.201003644 · DOI
- Yamada, 2006, Chem. Commun., 383, 10.1039/B513848E · DOI
- Hickmann, 2011, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 13471, 10.1021/ja204027a · DOI
- Nishizawa, 2007, J. Mater. Chem., 17, 2440, 10.1039/B701438D · DOI
- Liman, 2013, J. Phys. Chem. B, 117, 14557, 10.1021/jp408220e · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells
Mahmood, A., Hu, J.-Y., Xiao, B., Tang, A., Wang, X., & Zhou, E. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta06392c · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamura, Y., Saeki, H., Hashizume, J., Okazaki, Y., Kuzuhara, D., Suzuki, M., Aratani, N., & Yamada, H.
- Affiliations
- Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
- Ehime University (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamada, Hiroko
- Venue
- Chemical Communications
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014-06-17
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 72
- Pages
- 10379
- ISSN
- 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2149913389
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- naist.repo.nii.ac.jp
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Chemical Communications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NAIST Digital Library (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25288092)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Fullerene Chemistry and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
- Keywords
- tetrabenzoporphyrin, C60, organic solar cells, PCBM, polymer blend films, power conversion efficiency, fill factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
