Computational characterization of parallel dimeric and trimeric coiled-coils using effective amino acid indices
Abstract
The coiled-coil, which consists of two or more α-helices winding around each other, is a ubiquitous and the most frequently observed protein–protein interaction motif in nature. The coiled-coil is known for its straightforward heptad repeat pattern and can be readily recognized based on protein primary sequences, exhibiting a variety of oligomer states and topologies. Due to the stable interaction formed between their α-helices, coiled-coils have been under close scrutiny to design novel protein structures for potential applications in the fields of material science, synthetic biology and medicine. However, their broader application requires an in-depth and systematic analysis of the sequence-to-structure relationship of coiled-coil folding and oligomeric formation. In this article, we propose a new oligomerization state predictor, termed as RFCoil, which exploits the most useful and non-redundant amino acid indices combined with the machine learning algorithm – random forest (RF) – to predict the oligomeric states of coiled-coil regions. Benchmarking experiments show that RFCoil achieves an AUC (area under the ROC curve) of 0.849 on the 10-fold cross-validation test using the training dataset and 0.855 on the independent test using the validation dataset, respectively. Performance comparison results indicate that RFCoil outperforms the four existing predictors LOGICOIL, PrOCoil, SCORER 2.0 and Multicoil2. Furthermore, we extract a number of predominant rules from the trained RF model that underlie the oligomeric formation. We also present two case studies to illustrate the applicability of the extracted rules to the prediction of coiled-coil oligomerization state. The RFCoil web server, source codes and datasets are freely available for academic users at http://protein.cau.edu.cn/RFCoil/.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial attempts on predicting oligomerization states in coiled coils focused on distinguishing dimers from trimers.
“Initial attempts on predicting oligomerization states in coiled coils focused on distinguishing dimers from trimers.34−39”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Paircoil2: improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence.
McDonnell, A. V., Jiang, T., Keating, A. E., & Berger, B. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti797 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Walshaw, J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4545 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Trigg, J., Gutwin, K., Keating, A. E., & Berger, B. (2011) · PLoS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023519 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
SCORER 2.0: an algorithm for distinguishing parallel dimeric and trimeric coiled-coil sequences
Armstrong, C. T., Vincent, T. L., Green, P. J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr299 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Mahrenholz, C. C., Abfalter, I. G., Bodenhofer, U., Volkmer, R., & Hochreiter, S. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m110.004994 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical assessment of coiled-coil predictions based on protein structure data
Simm, D., Hatje, K., Waack, S., & Kollmar, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91886-w · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Notari, E., Wood, C. W., & Michel, J. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01695 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, C., Wang, X.-F., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Song, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shanxi Normal University c , Linfen 041004, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Ziding
- Song, Jiangning
- Venue
- Molecular BioSystems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-11-18
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 354-360
- ISSN
- 1742-2051 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-206X
- OpenAlex
- W2046371018
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular BioSystems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11250110508, 31350110507, 61202167, 61303169)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- coiled coil, protein-protein interaction motifs, random forest, heptad repeat
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acids, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Protein Structure, Secondary, Computational Biology, Area Under Curve, Databases, Protein, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review