Cited by 49Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

SCORER 2.0: an algorithm for distinguishing parallel dimeric and trimeric coiled-coil sequences

Open access
Armstrong, Craig T., Vincent, Thomas L., Green, Peter J., Woolfson, Derek N.·2011·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The coiled coil is a ubiquitous α-helical protein structure domain that directs and facilitates protein–protein interactions in a wide variety of biological processes. At the protein-sequence level, coiled coils are quite straightforward and readily recognized via the conspicuous heptad repeats of hydrophobic and polar residues. However, structurally they are more complicated, existing in a range of oligomer states and topologies. Here, we address the issue of predicting coiled-coil oligomeric state from protein sequence. Results: The predominant coiled-coil oligomer states in Nature are parallel dimers and trimers. Here, we improve and retrain the first-published algorithm, SCORER, that distinguishes these states, and test it against the current standard, MultiCoil. The SCORER algorithm has been revised in two key respects: first, the statistical basis for SCORER is improved markedly. Second, the training set for SCORER has been expanded and updated to include only structurally validated coiled coils. The result is a much-improved oligomer state predictor that outperforms MultiCoil, particularly in assigning oligomer state to short coiled coils, and those that are diverse from the training set. Availability: SCORER 2.0 is available via a web interface at http://coiledcoils.chm.bris.ac.uk/Scorer. Source code, training sets and Supporting Information can be downloaded from the same site. Contact: coiledcoils-scorer@sympa.bristol.ac.uk; d.n.woolfson@bristol.ac.uk Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr299

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, C. T., Vincent, T. L., Green, P. J., & Woolfson, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2011-05-16
Volume
27
Issue
14
Pages
1908-1914
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2109354682
Cited by
49
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D063485/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
coiled coil, parallel dimer, trimers, protein sequences, heptad repeat, protein-protein interaction, web server
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Proteins, Software, Protein Structure, Secondary, Internet, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Amino Acid Motifs, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review