Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probing the correlations between the defects in metal–organic frameworks and their catalytic activity by an epoxide ring-opening reaction

Liu, Yangyang, Klet, Rachel C., Hupp, Joseph T., Farha, Omar·2016·Chemical Communications

Abstract

The number of defects in a series of Zr/Hf-MOFs was found to correlate quantitatively with their catalytic activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6cc03727e

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Klet, R. C., Hupp, J. T., & Farha, O.
Venue
Chemical Communications
Published
2016
Volume
52
Issue
50
Pages
7806-7809
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
OpenAlex
W2405848894
Cited by
227
References
2
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing the correlations between the defects in metal–organic frameworks and their catalytic activity by an epoxide ring-opening reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6cc03727e
The paper
Liu, Y., Klet, R. C., Hupp, J. T., & Farha, O. (2016). Probing the correlations between the defects in metal–organic frameworks and their catalytic activity by an epoxide ring-opening reaction. Chemical Communications. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc03727e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.