Cited by 32Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis

Stimulated X-ray Raman scattering – a critical assessment of the building block of nonlinear X-ray spectroscopy

Open access
Kimberg, Victor, Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro, Mercadier, Laurent, Weninger, Clemens, Lutman, Alberto, Ratner, Daniel, Coffee, Ryan, Bucher, Maximilian +7 more·2016·Faraday Discussions

Abstract

With the invention of femtosecond X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs), studies of light-induced chemical reaction dynamics and structural dynamics reach a new era, allowing for time-resolved X-ray diffraction and spectroscopy. To ultimately probe coherent electron and nuclear dynamics on their natural time and length scales, coherent nonlinear X-ray spectroscopy schemes have been proposed. In this contribution, we want to critically assess the experimental realisation of nonlinear X-ray spectroscopy at current-day XFEL sources, by presenting first experimental attempts to demonstrate stimulated resonant X-ray Raman scattering in molecular gas targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6fd00103c

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-sorting the pair of pulses according to their total pulse energy and electron-beam energy resulted in very stable, reproducible spectral averages, so that relative differences of greater than 5% are measurable using this pulse combination.

    “We, however, demonstrated that post-sorting the pair of pulses according to their total pulse energy and the electron-beam energy resulted in very stable, reproducible spectral averages, so that relative differences of >5% are measurable using this pulse combination [63].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Unaligned molecular targets at currently obtainable peak brilliances will give rise to soft x-ray Raman amplification of only a few per cent.

    “As opposed to the studies in neon, where a Raman gain of up to eight orders of magnitude has been demonstrated [59], unaligned molecular targets at currently obtainable peak brilliances will give rise to soft x-ray Raman amplification of only a few per cent [62,63].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. P. Kukura, D. W. McCamant and R. A. Mathies, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2007, 58, 461-488.
  2. R. R. Frontiera and R. A. Mathies, Laser Photonics Rev., 2011, 5, 102-113.
  3. S. Tanaka and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 043001.
  4. I. Schweigert and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A, 2007, 76, 012504.
  5. U. Harbola and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2009, 79, 085108.
  6. W. Hua, S. Oesterling, J. D. Biggs, Y. Zhang, H. Ando, R. de Vivie-Riedle, B. P. Fingerhut and S. Mukamel, Struct. Dyn., 2016, 3, 023601.
  7. Y. Zhang, W. Hua, K. Bennett and S. Mukamel, Top. Curr. Chem., 2014, 368, 273.
  8. D. Healion, H. Wang and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys., 2011, 134, 124101.
  9. C. Weninger, M. Purvis, D. Ryan, R. a. London, J. D. Bozek, C. Bostedt, A. Graf, G. Brown, J. J. Rocca and N. Rohringer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 111, 233902.
  10. C. Weninger and N. Rohringer, Phys. Rev. A, 2013, 88, 053421.
  11. V. Kimberg and N. Rohringer, Struct. Dyn., 2016, 3, 034101.
  12. V. Kimberg and N. Rohringer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110, 043901.
  13. R. C. Couto, M. Guarise, A. Nicolaou, N. Jaouen, G. S. Chiuzbȃian, J. Lüning, V. Ekholm, J.-E. Rubensson, C. Såthe, F. Hennies, F. F. Guimarães, H. Ågren, F. Gel'mukhanov, L. Journel, M. Simon and V. Kimberg, Phys. Rev. A, 2016, 93, 032510.
  14. N. Rohringer, V. Kimberg, C. Weninger, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. Lutman, T. Maxwell, C. Bostedt, S. C. Monterro, A. O. Lindahl, M. Ilchen, R. N. Coffee, J. D. Bozek, J. Krzywinski, T. Kierspel, T. Mullins, J. Küpper, B. Erk, D. Rolles, O. D. Mücke, R. A. London, M. Purvis, D. Ryan, J. J. Rocca, R. Feifel, R. Squibb, V. Zhaunerchyk, C. Såthe, M. Agåker, M. Mucke, J. Nordgren and J. E. Rubensson, in X-ray Lasers 2014. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on X-Ray Lasers, ed. J. J. Rocca, C. Meloni and M. Marconi, 2016, vol. 169, p. 201.
  15. S. Schreck, M. Beye, J. a. Sellberg, T. McQueen, H. Laksmono, B. Kennedy, S. Eckert, D. Schlesinger, D. Nordlund, H. Ogasawara, R. G. Sierra, V. H. Segtnan, K. Kubicek, W. F. Schlotter, G. L. Dakovski, S. P. Moeller, U. Bergmann, S. Techert, L. G. M. Pettersson, P. Wernet, M. J. Bogan, Y. Harada, A. Nilsson and A. Föhlisch, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 113, 153002.
  16. P. Skytt, P. Glans, K. Gunnelin, J. Guo and J. Nordgren, Phys. Rev. A, 1997, 55, 146-154.
  17. M. Piancastelli, M. Neeb, A. Kivimäki, B. Kempgens, H. M. Köppet, K. Maier, A. M. Bradshaw, R. F. Fink and H. M. Köppe, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys., 1997, 30, 5677-5692.
  18. D. Damiani, M. Dubrovin, I. Gaponenko, W. Kroeger, T. J. Lane, A. Mitra, C. P. O'Grady, A. Salnikov, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, D. Schneider and C. H. Yoon, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2016, 49, 672-679.
  19. S. Smith, S. Hoobler, R. G. Johnson, T. Straumann and A. Young, in Proceedings of PAC '09, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, p. TU3GRC05.
  20. S. P. Hau-Riege, R. M. Bionta, D. D. Ryutov and J. Krzywinski, J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 103, 053306.
  21. A. Lutman, R. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, T. Maxwell, M. Messerschmidt and H.-D. Nuhn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110, 134801.
  22. P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, D. Dowell, S. Edstrom, A. Fisher, J. Frisch, S. Gilevich, J. Hastings, G. Hays, P. Hering, Z. Huang, R. Iverson, H. Loos, M. Messerschmidt, A. Miahnahri, S. Moeller, H.-D. Nuhn, G. Pile, D. Ratner, J. Rzepiela, D. Schultz, T. Smith, P. Stefan, H. Tompkins, J. Turner, J. Welch, W. White, J. Wu, G. Yocky and J. Galayda, Nat. Photonics, 2010, 4, 641-647.
  23. P. Emma, K. Bane, M. Cornacchia, Z. Huang, H. Schlarb, G. Stupakov and D. Walz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92, 074801.
  24. Y. Ding, C. Behrens, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, P. Emma, C. Field, W. Helml, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, J. Krzywinski, H. Loos, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. J. Maxwell and J. Turner, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2015, 107, 191104.
  25. A. Marinelli, R. Coffee, S. Vetter, P. Hering, G. N. West, S. Gilevich, A. A. Lutman, S. Li, T. Maxwell, J. Galayda, A. Fry and Z. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 116, 254801.
  26. D. Ratner, R. Abela, J. Amann, C. Behrens, D. Bohler, G. Bouchard, C. Bostedt, M. Boyes, K. Chow, D. Cocco, F. J. Decker, Y. Ding, C. Eckman, P. Emma, D. Fairley, Y. Feng, C. Field, U. Flechsig, G. Gassner, J. Hastings, P. Heimann, Z. Huang, N. Kelez, J. Krzywinski, H. Loos, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, G. Marcus, T. Maxwell, P. Montanez, S. Moeller, D. Morton, H. D. Nuhn, N. Rodes, W. Schlotter, S. Serkez, T. Stevens, J. Turner, D. Walz, J. Welch and J. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 114, 054801.
  27. A. Marinelli, A. A. Lutman, J. Wu, Y. Ding, J. Krzywinski, H.-D. Nuhn, Y. Feng, R. N. Coffee and C. Pellegrini, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 111, 134801.
  28. M. Coreno, M. de Simone, K. C. Prince, R. Richter, M. Vondracek, L. Avaldi and R. Camilloni, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1999, 306, 269-274.
  29. V. Kimberg, S. Zhang and N. Rohringer, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys., 2013, 46, 164017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimberg, V., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Mercadier, L., Weninger, C., Lutman, A., Ratner, D., Coffee, R., Bucher, M., Mucke, M., Agåker, M., Såthe, C., Bostedt, C., Nordgren, J., Rubensson, J. E., & Rohringer, N.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter (DE)
  • Imperial College
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Kimberg, Victor
  • Rohringer, Nina
Venue
Faraday Discussions
Published
2016
Volume
194
Pages
305-324
ISSN
  • 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5498
OpenAlex
W2421283582
Cited by
32
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Faraday Discussions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (KAW-2013.0020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
X-ray free-electron laser, femtosecond X-ray pulses, coherent electron dynamics, time-resolved X-ray spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review