Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 311 of the 311 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Platinum nanoparticles in nanobiomedicine

Pedone, Deborah, Moglianetti, Mauro, De Luca, Elisa, Bardi, Giuseppe, Pompa, Pier Paolo·2017·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This review reports a critical overview of the potential applications of platinum nanoparticles in nanomedicine with special focus on their nanozyme properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7cs00152e

Cites

311 of 311 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–311 of 311

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Pedone, D., Moglianetti, M., De Luca, E., Bardi, G., & Pompa, P. P.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2017
Volume
46
Issue
16
Pages
4951-4975
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2734984037
Cited by
454
References
311
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.