Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 304 of the 304 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries: a practical perspective

Eftekhari, Ali, Kim, Dong-Won·2017·Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Abstract

The most important challenge in the practical development of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is finding suitable cathode materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7ta00799j

Cites

304 of 304 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 304 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Eftekhari, A., & Kim, D.-W.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Published
2017
Volume
5
Issue
34
Pages
17734-17776
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
OpenAlex
W2672375426
Cited by
285
References
304
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries: a practical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c7ta00799j
The paper
Eftekhari, A., & Kim, D.-W. (2017). Cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries: a practical perspective. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta00799j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.