Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Boosting water decomposition by sulfur vacancies for efficient CO2 photoreduction

Yin, Shikang, Zhao, Xiaoxue, Jiang, Enhui, Yan, Yan, Zhou, Peng, Huo, Pengwei·2022·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

As the rate-determining half reaction (OER) in the overall CO 2 photoreduction, the four-electron-involving OER on S-vacancy sites was favored, therefore facilitating the hole-elimination/proton release and unleashing the CO 2 reduction half reaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d1ee03764a

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Metadata

Authors
Yin, S., Zhao, X., Jiang, E., Yan, Y., Zhou, P., & Huo, P.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2022
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1556-1562
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W4226065832
Cited by
267
References
25
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boosting water decomposition by sulfur vacancies for efficient CO2 photoreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/d1ee03764a
The paper
Yin, S., Zhao, X., Jiang, E., Yan, Y., Zhou, P., & Huo, P. (2022). Boosting water decomposition by sulfur vacancies for efficient CO2 photoreduction. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee03764a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.