Cited by 92

Bayesian optimization with known experimental and design constraints for chemistry applications

Hickman, Riley J., Aldeghi, Matteo, Häse, Florian, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán·2022·Digital Discovery

Abstract

A Bayesian optimization algorithm that satisfies known constraints has been developed. The usefulness of considering experimental and design constraints are shown in two simulated chemistry applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2dd00028h

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. K. D. Collins, T. Gensch, and F. Glorius, "Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and develop- ment," Nature Chemistry, vol. 6, pp. 859-871, Oct. 2014.
  2. V. Blay, B. Tolani, S. P. Ho, and M. R. Arkin, "High- Throughput Screening: today's biochemical and cell- based approaches," Drug Discovery Today, vol. 25, pp. 1807-1821, Oct. 2020.
  3. W. Zeng, L. Guo, S. Xu, J. Chen, and J. Zhou, "High- Throughput Screening Technology in Industrial Biotech- nology," Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 38, pp. 888-906, Aug. 2020.
  4. L. Cheng, R. S. Assary, X. Qu, A. Jain, S. P. Ong, N. N. Rajput, K. Persson, and L. A. Curtiss, "Accelerat- ing Electrolyte Discovery for Energy Storage with High- Throughput Screening," The Journal of Physical Chem- istry Letters, vol. 6, pp. 283-291, Jan. 2015.
  5. J. Močkus, "On bayesian methods for seeking the ex- tremum," in Optimization techniques IFIP technical con- ference, pp. 400-404, Springer, 1975.
  6. J. Mockus, V. Tiesis, and A. Zilinskas, "The application of bayesian methods for seeking the extremum," Towards global optimization, vol. 2, no. 117-129, p. 2, 1978.
  7. J. Mockus, Bayesian approach to global optimization: theory and applications, vol. 37. Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 2012.
  8. M. Christensen, L. P. E. Yunker, F. Adedeji, F. Häse, L. M. Roch, T. Gensch, G. dos Passos Gomes, T. Ze- pel, M. S. Sigman, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. E. Hein, "Data-science driven autonomous process optimization," Communications Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021.
  9. M. Reis, F. Gusev, N. G. Taylor, S. H. Chung, M. D. Ver- ber, Y. Z. Lee, O. Isayev, and F. A. Leibfarth, "Machine- learning-guided discovery of 19f mri agents enabled by automated copolymer synthesis," Journal of the Ameri- can Chemical Society, vol. 143, no. 42, pp. 17677-17689, 2021.
  10. S. Langner, F. Häse, J. D. Perea, T. Stubhan, J. Hauch, L. M. Roch, T. Heumueller, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and C. J. Brabec, "Beyond ternary opv: High-throughput exper- imentation and self-driving laboratories optimize multi- component systems," Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 14, p. 1907801, 2020.
  11. B. P. MacLeod, F. G. L. Parlane, T. D. Morrissey, F. Häse, L. M. Roch, K. E. Dettelbach, R. Moreira, L. P. E. Yunker, M. B. Rooney, J. R. Deeth, V. Lai, G. J. Ng, H. Situ, R. H. Zhang, M. S. Elliott, T. H. Ha- ley, D. J. Dvorak, A. Aspuru-Guzik, J. E. Hein, and C. P. Berlinguette, "Self-driving laboratory for accelerated dis- covery of thin-film materials," Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 20, p. eaaz8867, 2020.
  12. D. E. Graff, E. I. Shakhnovich, and C. W. Coley, "Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learning," Chemical Science, vol. 12, pp. 7866-7881, 2021.
  13. A. E. Gongora, B. Xu, W. Perry, C. Okoye, P. Ri- ley, K. G. Reyes, E. F. Morgan, and K. A. Brown, "A bayesian experimental autonomous researcher for mechanical design," Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 15, p. eaaz1708, 2020.
  14. L. M. Roch, F. Häse, C. Kreisbeck, T. Tamayo-Mendoza, L. P. E. Yunker, J. E. Hein, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "ChemOS: An orchestration software to democratize autonomous discovery," PLOS One, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e0229862, 2020.
  15. J.-P. Correa-Baena, K. Hippalgaonkar, J. van Duren, S. Jaffer, V. R. Chandrasekhar, V. Stevanovic, C. Wa- dia, S. Guha, and T. Buonassisi, "Accelerating Materi- als Development via Automation, Machine Learning, and High-Performance Computing," Joule, vol. 2, pp. 1410- 1420, Aug. 2018.
  16. H. S. Stein and J. M. Gregoire, "Progress and prospects for accelerating materials science with automated and au- tonomous workflows," Chemical Science, vol. 10, no. 42, pp. 9640-9649, 2019.
  17. E. Stach, B. DeCost, A. G. Kusne, J. Hattrick-Simpers, K. A. Brown, K. G. Reyes, J. Schrier, S. Billinge, T. Buonassisi, I. Foster, C. P. Gomes, J. M. Gre- goire, A. Mehta, J. Montoya, E. Olivetti, C. Park, E. Rotenberg, S. K. Saikin, S. Smullin, V. Stanev, and B. Maruyama, "Autonomous experimentation systems for materials development: A community perspective," Matter, vol. 4, pp. 2702-2726, Sept. 2021.
  18. C. W. Coley, N. S. Eyke, and K. F. Jensen, "Au- tonomous Discovery in the Chemical Sciences Part I: Progress," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 59, no. 51, pp. 22858-22893, 2020.
  19. C. W. Coley, N. S. Eyke, and K. F. Jensen, "Au- tonomous Discovery in the Chemical Sciences Part II: Outlook," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 59, no. 52, pp. 23414-23436, 2020.
  20. A. Dave, J. Mitchell, K. Kandasamy, H. Wang, S. Burke, B. Paria, B. Póczos, J. Whitacre, and V. Viswanathan, "Autonomous Discovery of Battery Electrolytes with Robotic Experimentation and Machine Learning," Cell Reports Physical Science, vol. 1, p. 100264, Dec. 2020.
  21. A. Deshwal, C. M. Simon, and J. Rao Doppa, "Bayesian optimization of nanoporous materials," Molecular Sys- tems Design & Engineering, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1066-1086, 2021.
  22. A. G. Kusne, H. Yu, C. Wu, H. Zhang, J. Hattrick- Simpers, B. DeCost, S. Sarker, C. Oses, C. Toher, S. Cur- tarolo, A. V. Davydov, R. Agarwal, L. A. Bendersky, M. Li, A. Mehta, and I. Takeuchi, "On-the-fly closed- loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning," Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 5966, Dec. 2020.
  23. H. Tao, T. Wu, S. Kheiri, M. Aldeghi, A. Aspuru- Guzik, and E. Kumacheva, "Self-Driving Platform for Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis: Combining Microfluidics and Machine Learning," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 51, p. 2106725, 2021.
  24. P. B. Wigley, P. J. Everitt, A. van den Hengel, J. W. Bastian, M. A. Sooriyabandara, G. D. McDonald, K. S. Hardman, C. D. Quinlivan, P. Manju, C. C. N. Kuhn, I. R. Petersen, A. N. Luiten, J. J. Hope, N. P. Robins, and M. R. Hush, "Fast machine-learning online optimiza- tion of ultra-cold-atom experiments," Scientific Reports, vol. 6, May 2016.
  25. F. Häse, L. M. Roch, C. Kreisbeck, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry," ACS Central Science, vol. 4, pp. 1134-1145, Sept. 2018.
  26. F. Häse, M. Aldeghi, R. J. Hickman, L. M. Roch, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Gryffin: An algorithm for Bayesian optimization of categorical variables informed by expert knowledge," Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 8, p. 031406, Sept. 2021.
  27. M. Aldeghi, F. Häse, R. J. Hickman, I. Tamblyn, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Golem: an algorithm for robust ex- periment and process optimization," Chem. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 14792-14807, 2021.
  28. M. Seifrid, R. J. Hickman, A. Aguilar-Granda, C. Lav- igne, J. Vestfrid, T. C. Wu, T. Gaudin, E. J. Hopkins, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Routescore: Punching the ticket to more efficient materials development," ACS Central Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 122-131, 2022.
  29. B. E. Walker, J. H. Bannock, A. M. Nightingale, and J. C. deMello, "Tuning reaction products by constrained optimisation," Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 785-798, 2017.
  30. M. A. Gelbart, J. Snoek, and R. P. Adams, "Bayesian op- timization with unknown constraints," in Proceedings of the Thirtieth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial In- telligence, UAI'14, (Arlington, Virginia, USA), pp. 250- 259, AUAI Press, 2014.
  31. R. B. Gramacy and H. K. H. Lee, "Optimization Un- der Unknown Constraints," arXiv:1004.4027 [stat], July 2010. · arXiv
  32. M. A. Gelbart, J. Snoek, and R. P. Adams, "Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraints," arXiv:1403.5607 [cs, stat], Mar. 2014. · arXiv
  33. S. Ariafar, J. Coll-Font, D. Brooks, and J. Dy, "AD- MMBO: Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Con- straints using ADMM," Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, vol. 20, no. 123, pp. 1-26, 2019.
  34. C. Antonio, "Sequential model based optimization of partially defined functions under unknown constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 79, pp. 281-303, Feb. 2021.
  35. S. Sun, A. Tiihonen, F. Oviedo, Z. Liu, J. Thapa, Y. Zhao, N. T. P. Hartono, A. Goyal, T. Heumueller, C. Batali, A. Encinas, J. J. Yoo, R. Li, Z. Ren, I. M. Peters, C. J. Brabec, M. G. Bawendi, V. Stevanovic, J. Fisher, III, and T. Buonassisi, "A data fusion approach to optimize compositional stability of halide perovskites," Matter, vol. 4, pp. 1305-1322, Apr. 2021. Publisher: El- sevier.
  36. Z. Liu, N. Rolston, A. C. Flick, T. Colburn, Z. Ren, R. H. Dauskardt, and T. Buonassisi, "Machine Learn- ing with Knowledge Constraints for Process Optimiza- tion of Open-Air Perovskite Solar Cell Manufacturing," arXiv:2110.01387 [physics], Sept. 2021. · arXiv
  37. B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. P. Adams, and N. de Freitas, "Taking the human out of the loop: A re- view of bayesian optimization," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 148-175, 2016.
  38. E. Jang, S. Gu, and B. Poole, "Categorical reparam- eterization with gumbel-softmax," in 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings, OpenReview.net, 2017.
  39. Y. W. T. Chris J. Maddison, Andriy Mnih, "The con- crete distribution: A continuous relaxation of discrete random variables," in 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings, Open- Review.net, 2017.
  40. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, "Adam: A Method for Stochas- tic Optimization," arXiv:1412.6980 [cs], Jan. 2017. · arXiv
  41. F.-A. Fortin, F.-M. De Rainville, M.-A. Gardner, M. Parizeau, and C. Gagné, "DEAP: Evolutionary al- gorithms made easy," Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, vol. 13, pp. 2171-2175, 2012.
  42. F.-M. De Rainville, F.-A. Fortin, M.-A. Gardner, M. Parizeau, and C. Gagné, "Deap: A python frame- work for evolutionary algorithms," in Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evo- lutionary computation, pp. 85-92, 2012.
  43. K. Kandasamy, K. R. Vysyaraju, W. Neiswanger, B. Paria, C. R. Collins, J. Schneider, B. Poczos, and E. P. Xing, "Tuning hyperparameters without grad students: Scalable and robust bayesian optimisation with dragon- fly.," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 21, no. 81, pp. 1-27, 2020.
  44. J. Behrmann, W. Grathwohl, R. T. Q. Chen, D. Duve- naud, and J.-H. Jacobsen, "Invertible residual networks," in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdi- nov, eds.), vol. 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, (Long Beach, California, USA), pp. 573-582, PMLR, 09-15 Jun 2019.
  45. F. Häse, M. Aldeghi, R. J. Hickman, L. M. Roch, M. Christensen, E. Liles, J. E. Hein, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, "Olympus: a benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planning," Machine Learn- ing: Science and Technology, vol. 2, p. 035021, July 2021.
  46. L. X. Chen, "Organic solar cells: Recent progress and challenges," ACS Energy Letters, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 2537- 2539, 2019.
  47. L. Hong, H. Yao, Y. Cui, Z. Ge, and J. Hou, "Recent advances in high-efficiency organic solar cells fabricated by eco-compatible solvents at relatively large-area scale," APL Materials, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 120901, 2020.
  48. C. J. Brabec, S. Gowrisanker, J. J. M. Halls, D. Laird, S. Jia, and S. P. Williams, "Polymer-fullerene bulk- heterojunction solar cells," Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 34, pp. 3839-3856, 2010.
  49. H. Kang, K.-H. Kim, T. E. Kang, C.-H. Cho, S. Park, S. C. Yoon, and B. J. Kim, "Effect of Fullerene Tris-adducts on the Photovoltaic Performance of P3HT:Fullerene Ternary Blends," ACS Applied Mate- rials & Interfaces, vol. 5, pp. 4401-4408, May 2013.
  50. A. Thakkar, V. Chadimová, E. J. Bjerrum, O. Engkvist, and J.-L. Reymond, "Retrosynthetic accessibility score (RAscore) -rapid machine learned synthesizability clas- sification from AI driven retrosynthetic planning," Chem- ical Science, vol. 12, pp. 3339-3349, Mar. 2021.
  51. T. M. Gür, "Review of electrical energy storage technolo- gies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage," Energy & Environmental Sci- ence, vol. 11, pp. 2696-2767, Oct. 2018.
  52. K. Lin, R. Gómez-Bombarelli, E. S. Beh, L. Tong, Q. Chen, A. Valle, A. Aspuru-Guzik, M. J. Aziz, and R. G. Gordon, "A redox-flow battery with an alloxazine- based organic electrolyte," Nature Energy, vol. 1, pp. 1-8, July 2016.
  53. P. Leung, A. A. Shah, L. Sanz, C. Flox, J. R. Morante, Q. Xu, M. R. Mohamed, C. Ponce de León, and F. C. Walsh, "Recent developments in organic redox flow bat- teries: A critical review," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 360, pp. 243-283, Aug. 2017.
  54. R. Ye, D. Henkensmeier, S. J. Yoon, Z. Huang, D. K. Kim, Z. Chang, S. Kim, and R. Chen, "Redox Flow Bat- teries for Energy Storage: A Technology Review," Jour- nal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage, vol. 15, Sept. 2017.
  55. K. Lourenssen, J. Williams, F. Ahmadpour, R. Clemmer, and S. Tasnim, "Vanadium redox flow batteries: A com- prehensive review," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 25, p. 100844, Oct. 2019.
  56. D. G. Kwabi, Y. Ji, and M. J. Aziz, "Electrolyte Lifetime in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Critical Re- view," Chemical Reviews, vol. 120, pp. 6467-6489, July 2020.
  57. K. Gong, Q. Fang, S. Gu, S. F. Y. Li, and Y. Yan, "Non- aqueous redox-flow batteries: organic solvents, support- ing electrolytes, and redox pairs," Energy & Environmen- tal Science, vol. 8, pp. 3515-3530, Nov. 2015.
  58. W. Duan, J. Huang, J. A. Kowalski, I. A. Shkrob, M. Vi- jayakumar, E. Walter, B. Pan, Z. Yang, J. D. Milshtein, B. Li, C. Liao, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Liu, J. S. Moore, F. R. Brushett, L. Zhang, and X. Wei, ""Wine-Dark Sea" in an Organic Flow Battery: Storing Negative Charge in 2,1,3-Benzothiadiazole Radicals Leads to Improved Cy- clability," ACS Energy Letters, vol. 2, pp. 1156-1161, May 2017.
  59. J. Huang, W. Duan, J. Zhang, I. A. Shkrob, R. S. Assary, B. Pan, C. Liao, Z. Zhang, X. Wei, and L. Zhang, "Sub- stituted thiadiazoles as energy-rich anolytes for nonaque- ous redox flow cells," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 6, pp. 6251-6254, Apr. 2018.
  60. J. Zhang, J. Huang, L. A. Robertson, I. A. Shkrob, and L. Zhang, "Comparing calendar and cycle life stability of redox active organic molecules for nonaqueous redox flow batteries," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 397, Sept. 2018.
  61. L. A. Robertson, I. A. Shkrob, G. Agarwal, Y. Zhao, Z. Yu, R. S. Assary, L. Cheng, J. S. Moore, and L. Zhang, "Fluorescence-Enabled Self-Reporting for Redox Flow Batteries," ACS Energy Letters, vol. 5, pp. 3062-3068, Sept. 2020.
  62. G. Agarwal, H. A. Doan, L. A. Robertson, L. Zhang, and R. S. Assary, "Discovery of Energy Storage Molecu- lar Materials Using Quantum Chemistry-Guided Multi- objective Bayesian Optimization," Chemistry of Materi- als, vol. 33, pp. 8133-8144, Oct. 2021.
  63. C. d. l. Cruz, A. Molina, N. Patil, E. Ventosa, R. Marcilla, and A. Mavrandonakis, "New insights into phenazine- based organic redox flow batteries by using high- throughput DFT modelling," Sustainable Energy & Fu- els, vol. 4, pp. 5513-5521, Oct. 2020.
  64. J. E. Bachman, L. A. Curtiss, and R. S. Assary, "In- vestigation of the Redox Chemistry of Anthraquinone Derivatives Using Density Functional Theory," The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 118, pp. 8852-8860, Sept. 2014.
  65. R. S. Assary, F. R. Brushett, and L. A. Curtiss, "Re- duction potential predictions of some aromatic nitrogen- containing molecules," RSC Advances, vol. 4, pp. 57442- 57451, Nov. 2014.
  66. S. Genheden, A. Thakkar, V. Chadimová, J.-L. Rey- mond, O. Engkvist, and E. Bjerrum, "AiZynthFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning," Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 12, p. 70, Nov. 2020.
  67. P. Ertl and A. Schuffenhauer, "Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molec- ular complexity and fragment contributions," Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 1, p. 8, June 2009.
  68. C. W. Coley, L. Rogers, W. H. Green, and K. F. Jensen, "SCScore: Synthetic Complexity Learned from a Reac- tion Corpus," Journal of Chemical Information and Mod- eling, vol. 58, pp. 252-261, Feb. 2018.
  69. M. Voršilák, M. Kolář, I. Čmelo, and D. Svozil, "SYBA: Bayesian estimation of synthetic accessibility of organic compounds," Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 12, p. 35, May 2020.
  70. H. Moriwaki, Y.-S. Tian, N. Kawashita, and T. Takagi, "Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator," Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 10, p. 4, Feb. 2018.
  71. M. Ponce, R. van Zon, S. Northrup, D. Gruner, J. Chen, F. Ertinaz, A. Fedoseev, L. Groer, F. Mao, B. C. Mundim, et al., "Deploying a top-100 supercomputer for large parallel workloads: The niagara supercomputer," in Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning), pp. 1-8, 2019.
  72. C. Loken, D. Gruner, L. Groer, R. Peltier, N. Bunn, M. Craig, T. Henriques, J. Dempsey, C.-H. Yu, J. Chen, et al., "Scinet: lessons learned from building a power- efficient top-20 system and data centre," in Journal of Physics-Conference Series, vol. 256, p. 012026, 2010.
  73. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs], January 2017. · arXiv
  74. Félix-Antoine Fortin, François-Michel De Rainville, Marc-André Gardner, Marc Parizeau, and Christian Gagné. DEAP: Evolutionary algorithms made easy. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13:2171-2175, 2012.
  75. François-Michel De Rainville, Félix-Antoine Fortin, Marc-André Gardner, Marc Parizeau, and Christian Gagné. Deap: A python framework for evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 85-92, 2012.
  76. Florian Häse, Matteo Aldeghi, Riley J. Hickman, Loïc M. Roch, Melodie Christensen, Elena Liles, Jason E. Hein, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Olympus: a benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(3):035021, July 2021.
  77. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024-8035.
  78. Barnaby E. Walker, James H. Bannock, Adrian M. Nightingale, and John C. deMello. Tuning reaction products by constrained optimisation. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 2(5):785-798, 2017.
  79. Florian Häse, Loïc M. Roch, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Chimera: enabling hierarchy based multi-objective optimization for self-driving laboratories. Chemical Science, 9(39):7642-7655, 2018.
  80. Garvit Agarwal, Hieu A. Doan, Lily A. Robertson, Lu Zhang, and Rajeev S. Assary. Discovery of Energy Storage Molecular Materials Using Quantum Chemistry-Guided Multiobjective Bayesian Optimization. Chemistry of Materials, 33(20):8133- 8144, October 2021.
  81. Jeng-Da Chai and Martin Head-Gordon. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dis- persion corrections. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 10(44):6615-6620, November 2008.
  82. Vitaly A. Rassolov, Mark A. Ratner, John A. Pople, Paul C. Redfern, and Larry A. Curtiss. 6-31G* basis set for third-row atoms. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 22(9):976-984, 2001.
  83. Aleksandr V. Marenich, Christopher J. Cramer, and Donald G. Truhlar. Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113(18):6378-6396, 2009.
  84. Amol Thakkar, Veronika Chadimová, Esben Jannik Bjerrum, Ola Engkvist, and Jean-Louis Reymond. Retrosynthetic accessibility score (RAscore) -rapid machine learned synthesizability classification from AI driven retrosynthetic planning. Chemical Science, 12(9):3339-3349, March 2021.
  85. Peter Ertl and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. Journal of Cheminformatics, 1(1):8, June 2009.
  86. Milan Voršilák, Michal Kolář, Ivan Čmelo, and Daniel Svozil. Syba: Bayesian estimation of synthetic accessibility of organic compounds. Journal of Cheminformatics, 12(1):35, 2021.
  87. Samuel Genheden, Amol Thakkar, Veronika Chadimová, Jean-Louis Reymond, Ola Engkvist, and Esben Bjerrum. AiZyn- thFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning. Journal of Cheminformatics, 12(1):70, November 2020.
  88. Florian Häse, Matteo Aldeghi, Riley J. Hickman, Loïc M. Roch, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Gryffin: An algorithm for Bayesian optimization of categorical variables informed by expert knowledge. Applied Physics Reviews, 8(3):031406, September 2021.
  89. Hirotomo Moriwaki, Yu-Shi Tian, Norihito Kawashita, and Tatsuya Takagi. Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator. Journal of Cheminformatics, 10(1):4, February 2018.

Authors
Hickman, R. J., Aldeghi, M., Häse, F., & Aspuru-Guzik, A.
Affiliations
Chemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada
Venue
Digital Discovery
Published
2022
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
732-744
ISSN
2635-098X
Cited by
92
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-18-S-B-001)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGSD3-534584-2019)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review