Cited by 427Machine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsVarious Chemistry Research Topics

Next-Generation Experimentation with Self-Driving Laboratories

Häse, Florian, Roch, Loïc M., Aspuru-Guzik, Alán·2019·Trends in Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.007

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Häse, F., Roch, L. M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Trends in Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
282-291
ISSN
2589-5974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921963218
Cited by
426
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 9
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tata Sons Limited − Alliance Agreement (A32391)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
Keywords
self-driving laboratories, automated experimentation, artificial intelligence, autonomous experimentation, materials discovery, hypothesis generation, high-throughput experimentation, functional materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review