Cited by 9X-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyMachine Learning in Materials ScienceEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When can we trust structural models derived from pair distribution function measurements?

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the importance of biasing structure refinement by model likelihood as a methodology for discriminating between different possible structure solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d4fd00106k

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cliffe, 2013, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 25, 454218
  2. Tucker, 2007, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 19, 335218

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maffettone, P. M., Fletcher, W. J. K., Nicholas, T. C., Deringer, V. L., Allison, J. R., Smith, L. J., & Goodwin, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Goodwin, Andrew L.
Venue
Faraday Discussions
Published
2025
Volume
255
Issue
0
Pages
311-324
ISSN
  • 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5498
OpenAlex
W4399185747
Cited by
8
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Faraday Discussions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (279705)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T517811/1)
  • Marshall Foundation
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (788144)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
pair distribution function, structural model, structure determination, peptide structure, amorphous calcium carbonate, machine learning, model discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review