The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When can we trust structural models derived from pair distribution function measurements?
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the importance of biasing structure refinement by model likelihood as a methodology for discriminating between different possible structure solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 · Cited by 7,101
Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations
Ramachandran, G. N., Ramakrishnan, C., & Sasisekharan, V. (1963) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80023-6 · Cited by 3,651
Bayes, T. (1763) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · Cited by 3,023
Conformation of Polypeptides and Proteins
Ramachandran, G. N., & Sasisekharan, V. (1968) · Advances in protein chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60402-7 · Cited by 2,950
On representing chemical environments
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 · Cited by 2,572
THE PRINCIPLES DETERMINING THE STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX IONIC CRYSTALS
Pauling, L. (1929) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01379a006 · Cited by 2,025
Reverse Monte Carlo Simulation: A New Technique for the Determination of Disordered Structures
McGreevy, R. L., & Pusztai, L. (1988) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927028808080958 · Cited by 1,688
Shen, Y., & Bax, A. (2013) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/s10858-013-9741-y · Cited by 1,123
Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials as Emerging Tools for Materials Science
Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A., & Cśanyi, G. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902765 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationSmall-angle scattering studies of biological macromolecules in solution
Svergun, D. I., & Koch, M. H. J. (2003) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/r05 · Cited by 1,008
Advances in protein structure prediction and design
Kuhlman, B., & Bradley, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x · Cited by 806
The Problem with Determining Atomic Structure at the Nanoscale
Billinge, S. J. L., & Levin, I. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135080 · Cited by 743
Behler, J. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201703114 · Cited by 713
A comparison of various commonly used correlation functions for describing total scattering
Keen, D. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889800019993 · Cited by 712
Underneath the Bragg Peaks, Structural Analysis of Complex Materials
(2003) · Pergamon materials series · doi:10.1016/s1470-1804(03)x8001-3 · Cited by 577
Shen, Y., & Bax, A. (2010) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/s10858-010-9433-9 · Cited by 557
The structure of melittin. II. Interpretation of the structure.
Terwilliger, T. C., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1982) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)65098-0 · Cited by 503
Water Is the Key to Nonclassical Nucleation of Amorphous Calcium Carbonate
Raiteri, P., & Gale, J. D. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja108508k · Cited by 420
Structural modelling of glasses using reverse Monte Carlo simulation
Keen, D. A., & McGreevy, R. L. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344423a0 · Cited by 321
Raiteri, P., Gale, J. D., Quigley, D., & Rodger, P. M. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp910977a · Cited by 255
The Local Structure of Amorphous Silicon
Treacy, M. M. J., & Borisenko, K. B. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1214780 · Cited by 238
8. The Crystal Structure of Bixbyite and the C-Modification of the Sesquioxides
Pauling, L. C., & Shappell, M. D. (1930) · Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials · doi:10.1515/zkri-1930-0109 · Cited by 219
Nanoporous Structure and Medium-Range Order in Synthetic Amorphous Calcium Carbonate
Goodwin, A. L., Michel, F. M., Phillips, B. L., Keen, D. A., Dove, M. T., & Reeder, R. J. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm100294d · Cited by 195
Self-citationAb initio determination of solid-state nanostructure
Juhás, P., Cherba, D., Duxbury, P. M., Punch, W. F., & Billinge, S. J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04556 · Cited by 192
NMR crystallography of molecular organics
Hodgkinson, P. (2020) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2020.03.001 · Cited by 184
Applications of pair distribution function methods to contemporary problems in materials chemistry
Young, C. A., & Goodwin, A. L. (2011) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c0jm04415f · Cited by 163
Self-citationOpletal, G., Petersen, T. C., O’Malley, B., Snook, I. K., McCulloch, D. G., Marks, N. A., & Yarovsky, I. (2002) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/089270204000002584 · Cited by 150
Weber, T., & Simonov, A. (2012) · Zeitschrift für Kristallographie · doi:10.1524/zkri.2012.1504 · Cited by 123
Interpretation of diffuse X-ray scatteringviamodels of disorder
Welberry, T. R., & Butler, B. D. (1994) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889893011392 · Cited by 121
Structure Determination of Disordered Materials from Diffraction Data
Cliffe, M. J., Dove, M. T., Drabold, D. A., & Goodwin, A. L. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.125501 · Cited by 117
Self-citationReverse Monte Carlo modeling of amorphous silicon
Biswas, P., Atta‐Fynn, R., & Drabold, D. A. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.195207 · Cited by 111
Application of the reverse Monte Carlo method to crystalline materials
Tucker, M. G., Dove, M. T., & Keen, D. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s002188980100930x · Cited by 107
One hundred years of diffuse scattering
Welberry, T. R., & Weber, T. (2015) · Crystallography Reviews · doi:10.1080/0889311x.2015.1046853 · Cited by 106
Structure of amorphous semiconductors: Reverse Monte Carlo studies ona-C,a-Si, anda-Ge
Gereben, O., & Pusztai, L. (1994) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.14136 · Cited by 100
A machine-learned interatomic potential for silica and its relation to empirical models
Erhard, L. C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K., & Deringer, V. L. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00768-w · Cited by 97
Self-citationTotal scattering and the pair distribution function in crystallography
Keen, D. A. (2020) · Crystallography Reviews · doi:10.1080/0889311x.2020.1797708 · Cited by 89
The Limited Predictive Power of the Pauling Rules
George, J., Waroquiers, D., Stefano, D. D., Petretto, G., Rignanese, G., & Hautier, G. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202000829 · Cited by 86
Patterson, A. L. (1939) · Nature · doi:10.1038/143939b0 · Cited by 56
Anker, A. S., Butler, K. T., Selvan, R., & Jensen, K. M. Ø. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d3sc05081e · Cited by 54
Pusztai, L., & Tóth, G. (1991) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.459827 · Cited by 53
Homology modeling of larger proteins guided by chemical shifts
Shen, Y., & Bax, A. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3437 · Cited by 51
Geometrically frustrated interactions drive structural complexity in amorphous calcium carbonate
Nicholas, T. C., Stones, A. E., Patel, A. R., Michel, F. M., Reeder, R. J., Aarts, D. G. A. L., Deringer, V. L., & Goodwin, A. L. (2023) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-023-01339-2 · Cited by 49
Self-citationOpportunities and challenges in understanding complex functional materials
Goodwin, A. L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12422-z · Cited by 46
Self-citationLocal structure study of the orbital order/disorder transition in LaMnO3
Thygesen, P. M. M., Young, C. A., Beake, E. O. R., Romero, F. D., Connor, L. D., Proffen, T. E., Phillips, A. E., Tucker, M. G., Hayward, M. A., Keen, D. A., et al. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.174107 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDove, M. T., & Li, G. (2022) · Nuclear Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.nucana.2022.100037 · Cited by 37
Machine learning interatomic potentials for amorphous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
Castel, N., André, D., Edwards, C., Evans, J. D., & Coudert, F. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d3dd00236e · Cited by 27
Unusual atomic arrangements in amorphous silicon
Kugler, S., Kohary, K. I., Kádas, K., & Pusztai, L. (2003) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/s0038-1098(03)00435-6 · Cited by 21
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Cliffe, 2013, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 25, 454218
- Tucker, 2007, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 19, 335218
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autonomous Synthesis of Nanoparticles with Target Scattering Patterns
Anker, A. S., Jensen, J., Gonzalez-Duque, M., Moreno, R., Smolska, A., Juelsholt, M., Hardion, V., Jørgensen, M. R. V., Faíña, A., Quinson, J., et al. (2026) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c15488 · Cited by 15
A generative diffusion model for amorphous materials
Yang, K., & Schwalbe‐Koda, D. (2025) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01901-1 · Cited by 12
Structure of a DNA‐Stabilized Ag 16 Cl 2 Nanocluster in Solution
Sapnik, A. F., Romolini, G., Cerretani, C., Vosch, T., & Jensen, K. M. Ø. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202422432 · Cited by 6
Vinod-Kumar, S., Smith, A. A., Redrouthu, V. S., Gindele, M. B., Gebauer, D., & Mathies, G. (2025) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d5cp01002k · Cited by 2
Structure of a DNA‐Stabilized Ag 16 Cl 2 Nanocluster in Solution
Sapnik, A. F., Romolini, G., Cerretani, C., Vosch, T., & Jensen, K. M. Ø. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202422432 · Cited by 1
Klemmt, R., Salek, A. G., Karlsen, M. A., Ravnsbæk, D. B., Martin, A. V., & Bøjesen, E. D. (2026) · ACS Materials Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c01636 · Cited by 1
Jiao, S., Yu, X., Li, H., & Chen, L. (2026) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-025-3091-4 · Cited by 1
Daramola, A. D., Parekh, M. N. H., Loveday, J. S., Proctor, J. E., Ackland, G. J., & Pruteanu, C. G. (2026) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ae4809 · Cited by 1
Very Weak but Strongly Directional N-H∙∙∙π Hydrogen Bonds in Benzene Ammonia/Methylamine SolutionsPreprint
Novoveska, M., Headen, T. F., Sella, A., Clancy, A. J., Skipper, N. T., & Mino, C. D. (2026) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.15000183/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Maffettone, P. M., Fletcher, W. J. K., Nicholas, T. C., Deringer, V. L., Allison, J. R., Smith, L. J., & Goodwin, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Goodwin, Andrew L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Faraday Discussions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 311-324
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- PMC
- PMC11388700
- OpenAlex
- W4399185747
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Faraday Discussions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (279705)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T517811/1)
- Marshall Foundation
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (788144)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- pair distribution function, structural model, structure determination, peptide structure, amorphous calcium carbonate, machine learning, model discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review