The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis
Open accessAbstract
Non-phagocytic eukaryotic cells can internalize particles <1 µm in size, encompassing pathogens, liposomes for drug delivery or lipoplexes applied in gene delivery. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of particle size on the pathway of entry and subsequent intracellular fate in non-phagocytic B16 cells, using a range of fluorescent latex beads of defined sizes (50–1000 nm). Our data reveal that particles as large as 500 nm were internalized by cells via an energy-dependent process. With an increase in size (50–500 nm), cholesterol depletion increased the efficiency of inhibition of uptake. The processing of the smaller particles was significantly perturbed upon microtubule disruption, while displaying a negligible effect on that of the 500 nm beads. Inhibitor and co-localization studies revealed that the mechanism by which the beads were internalized, and their subsequent intracellular routing, was strongly dependent on particle size. Internalization of microspheres with a diameter <200 nm involved clathrin-coated pits. With increasing size, a shift to a mechanism that relied on caveolae-mediated internalization became apparent, which became the predominant pathway of entry for particles of 500 nm in size. At these conditions, delivery to the lysosomes was no longer apparent. The data indicate that the size itself of (ligand-devoid) particles can determine the pathway of entry. The clathrin-mediated pathway of endocytosis shows an upper size limit for internalization of approx. 200 nm, and kinetic parameters may determine the almost exclusive internalization of such particles along this pathway rather than via caveolae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel
Nel, A., Xia, T., Mädler, L., & Li, N. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114397 · Cited by 9,324
Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles
Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E., & Oberdörster, J. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7339 · Cited by 7,891
Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface
Nel, A. E., Mädler, L., Velegol, D., Xia, T., Hoek, E. M. V., Somasundaran, P., Klaessig, F., Castranova, V., & Thompson, M. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2442 · Cited by 7,083
Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications
Petros, R. A., & DeSimone, J. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2591 · Cited by 3,651
Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials
Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207 · Cited by 3,017
Metadata
- Authors
- REJMAN, J., OBERLE, V., ZUHORN, I. S., & HOEKSTRA, D.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-169
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W2113972541
- Cited by
- 2,864
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj20031253
- The paper
- REJMAN, J., OBERLE, V., ZUHORN, I. S., & HOEKSTRA, D. (2004). Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20031253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.