The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel
Open accessAbstract
A homology model of the housefly voltage-gated sodium channel was developed to predict the location of binding sites for the insecticides fenvalerate, a synthetic pyrethroid, and DDT an early generation organochlorine. The model successfully addresses the state-dependent affinity of pyrethroid insecticides, their mechanism of action and the role of mutations in the channel that are known to confer insecticide resistance. The sodium channel was modelled in an open conformation with the insecticide-binding site located in a hydrophobic cavity delimited by the domain II S4-S5 linker and the IIS5 and IIIS6 helices. The binding cavity is predicted to be accessible to the lipid bilayer and therefore to lipid-soluble insecticides. The binding of insecticides and the consequent formation of binding contacts across different channel elements could stabilize the channel when in an open state, which is consistent with the prolonged sodium tail currents induced by pyrethroids and DDT. In the closed state, the predicted alternative positioning of the domain II S4-S5 linker would result in disruption of pyrethroid-binding contacts, consistent with the observation that pyrethroids have their highest affinity for the open channel. The model also predicts a key role for the IIS5 and IIIS6 helices in insecticide binding. Some of the residues on the helices that form the putative binding contacts are not conserved between arthropod and non-arthropod species, which is consistent with their contribution to insecticide species selectivity. Additional binding contacts on the II S4-S5 linker can explain the higher potency of pyrethroid insecticides compared with DDT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ranson, H., N’Guessan, R., Lines, J., Moiroux, N., Nkuni, Z., & Corbel, V. (2011) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2010.08.004 · Cited by 1,142
Haddi, K., Tomé, H. V. V., Du, Y., Valbon, W. R., Nomura, Y., Martins, G. F., Dong, K., & Oliveira, E. E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46549 · Cited by 208
Silva, A. P. B., Santos, J. M. M., & Martins, A. J. (2014) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-450 · Cited by 160
Corbel, V., & N’Guessan, R. (2013) · Anopheles mosquitoes - New insights into malaria vectors · doi:10.5772/56117 · Cited by 136
Reimer, L., Fondjo, E., Patchoke, S., Diallo, B., Lee, Y., Ng, A., Ndjemai, H. M., Atangana, J., Traore, S. F., Lanzaro, G., et al. (2008) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jmedent/45.2.260 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Reilly, A. O., Khambay, B. P. S., Williamson, M. S., Field, L. M., WAllace, B. A., & Davies, T. G. E.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2006-05-15
- Volume
- 396
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-263
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W1967287840
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj20051925
- The paper
- O'Reilly, A. O., Khambay, B. P. S., Williamson, M. S., Field, L. M., WAllace, B. A., & Davies, T. G. E. (2006). Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20051925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.