The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The selectivity of inhibitors of protein kinase CK2: an update
Open accessAbstract
CK2 (casein kinase 2) is a very pleiotropic serine/threonine protein kinase whose abnormally high constitutive activity has often been correlated to pathological conditions with special reference to neoplasia. The two most widely used cell permeable CK2 inhibitors, TBB (4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzotriazole) and DMAT (2-dimethylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzimidazole), are marketed as quite specific CK2 blockers. In the present study we show, by using a panel of approx. 80 protein kinases, that DMAT and its parent compound TBI (or TBBz; 4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzimidazole) are potent inhibitors of several other kinases, with special reference to PIM (provirus integration site for Moloney murine leukaemia virus)1, PIM2, PIM3, PKD1 (protein kinase D1), HIPK2 (homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2) and DYRK1a (dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylated and -regulated kinase 1a). In contrast, TBB is significantly more selective toward CK2, although it also inhibits PIM1 and PIM3. In an attempt to improve selectivity towards CK2 a library of 68 TBB/TBI-related compounds have been tested for their ability to discriminate between CK2, PIM1, HIPK2 and DYRK1a, ending up with seven compounds whose efficacy toward CK2 is markedly higher than that toward the second most inhibited kinase. Two of these, K64 (3,4,5,6,7-pentabromo-1H-indazole) and K66 (1-carboxymethyl-2-dimethylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-benzimidazole), display an overall selectivity much higher than TBB and DMAT when tested on a panel of 80 kinases and display similar efficacy as inducers of apoptosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yung-Chi, C., & Prusoff, W. H. (1973) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Brault, L., Gasser, C., Bracher, F., Huber, K., Knapp, S., & Schwaller, J. (2010) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.017079 · Cited by 368
Addiction to protein kinase CK2: A common denominator of diverse cancer cells?
Ruzzene, M., & Pinna, L. A. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.07.018 · Cited by 352
Self-citationPierre, F., Chua, P. C., O’Brien, S. E., Siddiqui-Jain, A., Bourbon, P., Haddach, M., Michaux, J., Nagasawa, J., Schwaebe, M. K., Stefan, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm101251q · Cited by 296
Chen, H., Chen, F., Liu, N., Wang, X., & Gou, S. (2018) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.09.005 · Cited by 51
McKay, S., Ryan, T. J., McQueen, J., Indersmitten, T., Marwick, K. F. M., Hasel, P., Kopanitsa, M. V., Baxter, P. S., Martel, M.-A., Kind, P. C., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.089 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Pagano, M. A., Bain, J., Kazimierczuk, Z., Sarno, S., Ruzzene, M., Di Maira, G., Elliott, M., Orzeszko, A., Cozza, G., Meggio, F., & Pinna, L. A.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-365
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W2011219963
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The selectivity of inhibitors of protein kinase CK2: an update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj20080309
- The paper
- Pagano, M. A., Bain, J., Kazimierczuk, Z., Sarno, S., Ruzzene, M., Di Maira, G., Elliott, M., Orzeszko, A., Cozza, G., Meggio, F., & Pinna, L. A. (2008). The selectivity of inhibitors of protein kinase CK2: an update. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20080309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.