Cited by 41Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Advances in metabolic flux analysis toward genome-scale profiling of higher organisms

Open access
Basler, Georg, Fernie, Alisdair R., Nikoloski, Zoran·2018·Bioscience Reports

Abstract

Methodological and technological advances have recently paved the way for metabolic flux profiling in higher organisms, like plants. However, in comparison with omics technologies, flux profiling has yet to provide comprehensive differential flux maps at a genome-scale and in different cell types, tissues, and organs. Here we highlight the recent advances in technologies to gather metabolic labeling patterns and flux profiling approaches. We provide an opinion of how recent local flux profiling approaches can be used in conjunction with the constraint-based modeling framework to arrive at genome-scale flux maps. In addition, we point at approaches which use metabolomics data without introduction of label to predict either non-steady state fluxes in a time-series experiment or flux changes in different experimental scenarios. The combination of these developments allows an experimentally feasible approach for flux-based large-scale systems biology studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bsr20170224

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FBA has been proven capable of making quantitatively realistic predictions of plant metabolic behavior.

    “This approach has been proven capable of making quantitatively realistic predictions of plant metabolic behavior (Basler et al., 2018; Moreira et al., 2019).”

    From Leaf Energy Balance Requires Mitochondrial Respiration and Export of Chloroplast NADPH in the Light (2019) · cites this paper as Basler et al., 2018

    In “Integration of unlabeled metabolomics data” (page unavailable), the review reports that a constraint-based approach predicted flux differences in Arabidopsis consistent with observed mutant phenotypes. It does not establish that FBA makes quantitatively realistic predictions of plant metabolism: the good agreement between FBA-based predictions and measured fluxes reported in “Highlighted advances of metabolic flux profiling at a genome-scale level” concerns E. coli, and that section cautions against assuming a single objective for plant metabolism. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Ratcliffe R.G. and Shachar-Hill Y. (2006) Measuring multiple fluxes through plant metabolic networks. Plant J. 45, 490– 511 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02649.x 16441345 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basler, G., Fernie, A. R., & Nikoloski, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (DE)
Corresponding author
Nikoloski, Zoran
Venue
Bioscience Reports
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
38
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0144-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4935
OpenAlex
W2896108989
Cited by
41
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioscience Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
metabolic flux analysis, metabolic labeling, constraint-based modeling, plant metabolism, systems biology
MeSH terms
Humans, Genome, Systems Biology, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metabolomics, Metabolic Flux Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review