The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both?
Abstract
Conference Article| November 01 1993 Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Paul M. Sharp; Paul M. Sharp * † *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Michele Stenico; Michele Stenico ‡ Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar John F. Peden; John F. Peden † Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Andrew T. Lloyd Andrew T. Lloyd 1Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Biochem Soc Trans (1993) 21 (4): 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0210835 Article history Received: July 30 1993 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation Paul M. Sharp, Michele Stenico, John F. Peden, Andrew T. Lloyd; Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both?. Biochem Soc Trans 1 November 1993; 21 (4): 835–841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0210835 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsBiochemical Society Transactions Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 1993 Biochemical Society1993 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria
Sharp, P. M. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki242 · Cited by 429
Self-citationA Role for Codon Order in Translation Dynamics
Cannarozzi, G., Schraudolph, N. N., Faty, M., von Rohr, P., Friberg, M. T., Roth, A. C., Gonnet, P., Gonnet, G., & Barral, Y. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.036 · Cited by 354
Evolutionary Implications of Microbial Genome Tetranucleotide Frequency Biases
Pride, D. T., Meinersmann, R. J., Wassenaar, T. M., & Blaser, M. J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.335003 · Cited by 289
Translational termination efficiency in mammals is influenced by the base following the stop codon
McCaughan, K. K., Brown, C. M., Dalphin, M. E., Berry, M. J., & Tate, W. P. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.12.5431 · Cited by 284
Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution
Akashi, H. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1291 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharp, P. M., Stenico, M., Peden, J. F., & Lloyd, A. T.
- Venue
- Biochemical Society Transactions
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1993-11-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 835-841
- ISSN
- 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8752
- OpenAlex
- W134991349
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bst0210835
- The paper
- Sharp, P. M., Stenico, M., Peden, J. F., & Lloyd, A. T. (1993). Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Biochemical Society Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0210835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
