Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutrophil Priming: Pathophysiological Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms

Condliffe, A. M., Kitchen, E., Chilvers, E. R.·1998·Clinical Science

Abstract

1. Neutrophil priming by agents such as tumour necrosis factor-α, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and lipopolysaccharide causes a dramatic increase in the response of these cells to an activating agent; this process has been shown to be critical for neutrophil-mediated tissue injury both in vitro and in vivo. 2. The principle consequence of priming, aside from a direct effect on cell polarization, deformability and integrin/selectin expression, is to permit secretagogue-induced superoxide anion generation, degranulation and lipid mediator (e.g. leukotriene B4 and arachidonic acid) release. It is now recognized that most priming agents also serve an additional function of delaying apoptosis and hence increasing the functional longevity of these cells at the inflamed site. 3. The potential mechanisms underlying priming are discussed; current data suggest a dissociation between priming and changes in receptor number and/or affinity, G-protein expression, phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 activation and changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. However, more recent studies support a key role for protein tyrosine phosphorylation and enhanced phospholipase D and phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in neutrophil priming. 4. Recent work has also revealed the potential for neutrophils to spontaneously and fully ‘de-prime’ after an initial challenge with platelet-activating factor. This ability of neutrophils to undergo a complete cycle of priming—de-priming (and re-priming) reveals a previously unrecognized flexibility in the control of neutrophil behaviour at an inflamed site.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs0940461

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Condliffe, A. M., Kitchen, E., & Chilvers, E. R.
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
461-471
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W1631483568
Cited by
362
References
1
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil Priming: Pathophysiological Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs0940461
The paper
Condliffe, A. M., Kitchen, E., & Chilvers, E. R. (1998). Neutrophil Priming: Pathophysiological Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms. Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0940461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.