Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomic analysis for the assessment of diabetic renal damage in humans

MISCHAK, Harald, KAISER, Thorsten, WALDEN, Michael, HILLMANN, Meike, WITTKE, Stefan, HERRMANN, Alena, KNUEPPEL, Stefan, HALLER, Hermann, FLISER, Danilo·2004·Clinical Science

Abstract

Renal disease in patients with Type II diabetes is the leading cause of terminal renal failure and a major healthcare problem. Hence early identification of patients prone to develop this complication is important. Diabetic renal damage should be reflected by a change in urinary polypeptide excretion at a very early stage. To analyse these changes, we used an online combination of CE/MS (capillary electrophoresis coupled with MS), allowing fast and accurate evaluation of up to 2000 polypeptides in urine. Employing this technology, we have examined urine samples from 39 healthy individuals and from 112 patients with Type II diabetes mellitus and different degrees of albumin excretion rate. We established a ‘normal’ polypeptide pattern in the urine of healthy subjects. In patients with Type II diabetes and normal albumin excretion rate, the polypeptide pattern in urine differed significantly from normal, indicating a specific ‘diabetic’ pattern of polypeptide excretion. In patients with higher grade albuminuria, we were able to detect a polypeptide pattern indicative of ‘diabetic renal damage’. We also found this pattern in 35% of those patients who had low-grade albuminuria and in 4% of patients with normal albumin excretion. Moreover, we could identify several of the indicative polypeptides using MS/MS sequencing. We conclude that proteomic analysis with CE/MS permits fast and accurate identification and differentiation of polypeptide patterns in urine. Longitudinal studies should explore the potential of this powerful diagnostic tool for early detection of diabetic renal damage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20040103

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
MISCHAK, H., KAISER, T., WALDEN, M., HILLMANN, M., WITTKE, S., HERRMANN, A., KNUEPPEL, S., HALLER, H., & FLISER, D.
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2004-10-26
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
485-495
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2054801022
Cited by
176
References
5
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic analysis for the assessment of diabetic renal damage in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs20040103
The paper
MISCHAK, H., KAISER, T., WALDEN, M., HILLMANN, M., WITTKE, S., HERRMANN, A., KNUEPPEL, S., HALLER, H., & FLISER, D. (2004). Proteomic analysis for the assessment of diabetic renal damage in humans. Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20040103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.