Cited by 153Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Protein restriction during gestation and/or lactation causes adverse transgenerational effects on biometry and glucose metabolism in F1 and F2 progenies of rats

Pinheiro, Alessandra R., Salvucci, Isadora D. M., Aguila, Marcia B., Mandarim-de-Lacerda, Carlos A.·2008·Clinical Science

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that poor intrauterine milieu elicited by maternal nutritional disturbance may programme susceptibility in the fetus to later development of chronic diseases, such as obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. One of the most interesting features of fetal programming is the evidence from several studies that the consequences may not be limited to the first-generation offspring and that it can be passed transgenerationally. In the present study, female rats (F0) were fed either a normal-protein diet [control diet (C); 19 g of protein/100 g of diet] or a low-protein diet [restricted diet (R); 5 g of protein/100 g of diet]. The offspring were termed according to the period and the types of diet the dams were fed, i.e. CC, RC, CR and RR (first letter indicates the diet during gestation and the second the diet during lactation). At 3 months of age, F1 females were bred to proven males, outside the experiment, to produce F2 offspring. At weaning, F2 offspring were divided by gender. RC1 offspring (with the number indicating the filial generation) were born with low birthweight, but afterwards they had catch-up growth, reaching the weight of the CC1 offspring. The increased glycaemia in RC1 offspring was associated with insulin resistance. CR1 and RR1 offspring had impaired growth with no changes in glucose metabolism. RC2 offspring had high BM (body mass) at birth, which was sustained over the whole experiment in male offspring. The F2 generation had more alteration in glucose metabolism than the F1 generation. CR2 and RC2 offspring had hyperglycaemia accompanied by hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance in both genders. CR2 offspring had an increase in body adiposity with hyperleptinaemia. In conclusion, low protein during gestation improves BM, fat mass and growth rate in F1 rats, but has adverse effects on glucose and leptin metabolism, resulting in insulin resistance in adult F1 and F2 offspring. Low protein during lactation has adverse effects on glucose, insulin and leptin metabolism, resulting in insulin resistance in adult F2 offspring. These findings suggest that low protein during gestation and/or lactation can be passed transgenerationally to the second generation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20070302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are greater increases in fat mass in first and second generation males from mothers that had been subjected to protein restriction during just gestation rather than gestation and lactation.

    “Moreover, there are greater increases in fat mass in first and second generation males from mothers that had been subjected to protein restriction during just gestation rather than gestation and lactation [77].”
  • Offspring from low protein fed mothers often display insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in adulthood.

    “However, offspring from low protein fed mothers accumulate greater amounts of fat as they mature [75, 76] and often display insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in adulthood [77, 78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinheiro, A. R., Salvucci, I. D. M., Aguila, M. B., & Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Laboratory of Morphometry and Cardiovascular Morphology, Biomedical Center, Institute of Biology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
381-392
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2000548593
Cited by
153
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
protein restriction, gestation, lactation, transgenerational effects, fetal programming, insulin resistance, glucose metabolism, leptin, hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, body mass, adiposity, catch-up growth, low birth weight, maternal nutrition, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Biometry, Blood Glucose, Female, Growth, Hyperglycemia, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin Resistance, Lactation, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Diet, Protein-Restricted, Leptin, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Fetal Development, Fetal Nutrition Disorders, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review