Cited by 46Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Acquisition and Maintenance of Scripts in Aphasia: A Comparison of Two Cuing Conditions

Open access
Cherney, Leora R., Kaye, Rosalind C., van Vuuren, Sarel·2014·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to compare acquisition and maintenance of scripts under two conditions: high cue, which provided numerous multimodality cues designed to minimize errors, and low cue, which provided minimal cues. Method: In a randomized controlled crossover study, eight individuals with chronic aphasia received intensive computer-based script training under two cuing conditions. Each condition lasted 3 weeks, with a 3-week washout period. Trained and untrained scripts were probed for accuracy and rate at baseline, during treatment, immediately posttreatment, and at 3 and 6 weeks posttreatment. Significance testing was conducted on gain scores, and effect sizes were calculated. Results: Training resulted in significant gains in script acquisition with maintenance of skills at 3 and 6 weeks posttreatment. Differences between cuing conditions were not significant. When severity of aphasia was considered, there also were no significant differences between conditions, although magnitude of change was greater in the high-cue condition versus the low-cue condition for those with more severe aphasia. Conclusions: Both cuing conditions were effective in acquisition and maintenance of scripts. The high-cue condition may be advantageous for those with more severe aphasia. Findings support the clinical use of script training and the importance of considering aphasia severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2014_ajslp-13-0097

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing studies with VR-based cognitive rehabilitation focused on specific language domains such as word retrieval, sentence building, and language comprehension.

    “Most of the existing studies with VR-based cognitive rehabilitation focused on specific language domains [25–28], such as word retrieval [18, 19, 43, 44, 46–48], sentence building [20, 21], and language comprehension [22].”

    From Conversational Therapy through Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality Environments for Language Recovery and Psychological Well-Being in Post Stroke Aphasia (2020) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Method (Treatment Intervention; page unavailable) describes computer-based conversational script training for aphasia using a digital therapist, so this paper is an example of rehabilitation focused on a specific language task. It does not characterize the intervention as VR-based or establish that most existing VR-based studies focused on specific language domains. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A series of case and small group studies has shown that AphasiaScripts is effective in teaching target dialogues and reducing speech errors, with good maintenance of therapy gains.

    “A series of case and small group studies has shown that AphasiaScripts is effective in teaching target dialogues and reducing speech errors, with good maintenance of therapy gains [48, 49].”
  • In the past, several VR systems for cognitive rehabilitation have only been studied with small numbers of participants and/or without control groups.

    “As reported in Introduction, in the past, several VR systems have been developed for cognitive rehabilitation; some of which have only gone through studies with a small number of participants [43, 47, 48] and/or without control groups [32].”
  • Of the seven studies targeting sentence level, four trained personalized conversational scripts with diminishing cues, supported by a virtual speech-language pathologist demonstrating correct speech movements (AphasiaScripts).

    “Of the seven studies targeting sentence level, four trained personalized conversational scripts with diminishing cues, supported by a virtual SLP demonstrating correct speech movements (AphasiaScripts) [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cherney, L. R., Kaye, R. C., & van Vuuren, S.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • University of Colorado, Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2014-05
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
S343-60
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W2023748635
Cited by
46
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC011754)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
aphasia, script training, chronic aphasia, aphasia severity, computer-based training, speech therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Cues, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Social Behavior, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Verbal Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review