Cited by 71Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentHearing Impairment and Communication

Toddlers’ Verb Lexicon Diversity and Grammatical Outcomes

Hadley, Pamela A., Rispoli, Matthew, Hsu, Ning·2016·Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

Abstract

Purpose: The goals of this study were to quantify longitudinal expectations for verb lexicon growth and to determine whether verb lexicon measures were better predictors of later grammatical outcomes than noun lexicon measures. Method: Longitudinal parent-report measures from the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (Fenson et al., 2007) from ages 21 to 30 months from an archival database were used to model growth in common noun and verb lexicon size for 45 typically developing toddlers. Communicative Development Inventory growth coefficients and 24-month measures of lexical diversity from spontaneous language samples were used to predict 30-month grammatical outcomes on the Index of Productive Syntax (Scarborough, 1990). Results: Average verb growth was characterized by 50.57 verbs at 24 months, with linear growth of 8.29 verbs per month and deceleration overall. Children with small verb lexicons or slow linear growth at 24 months accelerated during this developmental period. Verb lexicon measures were better predictors of grammatical outcomes than noun lexicon measures, accounting for 47.8% of the variance in Index of Productive Syntax scores. Lexical verb diversity in spontaneous speech emerged as the single best predictor. Conclusion: Measures of verb lexicon size and diversity should be included as part of early language assessment to guide clinical decision making with young children at risk for language impairment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2015_lshss-15-0018

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadley, P. A., Rispoli, M., & Hsu, N.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Published
2016-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
44-58
ISSN
  • 0161-1461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9129
OpenAlex
W2256200756
Cited by
71
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
verb lexicon, lexical diversity, toddlers, lexical growth, grammatical development, spontaneous speech, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Linguistics, Male, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review