Cited by 1,783Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentReading and Literacy Development

Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender

Huttenlocher, Janellen, Haight, Wendy, Bryk, Anthony, Seltzer, Michael, Lyons, Thomas·1991·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study examines the role of exposure to speech in children's early vocabulary growth. It is generally assumed that individual differences in vocabulary depend, in large part, on variations in learning capacity. However, variations in exposure have not been systematically explored. In this study we characterize vocabulary growth rates for each of 22 children by using data obtained at several time points from 14 to 26 months. We find a substantial relation between individual differences in vocabulary acquisition and variations in the amount that particular mothers speak to their children. The relation between amount of parent speech and vocabulary growth, we argue, reflects parent effects on the child, rather than child-ability effects on the parent or hereditary factors. We also find that gender is an important factor in rate of vocabulary growth. Early childhood is a period of rapid linguistic development. By 2 years, the average child acquires 900 root words (cf. Carey, 1978) and at least a rudimentary syntax (cf. Brown, 1973). Although there has been considerable recent interest in syntactic development, much less attention has been devoted to lexical development. Yet in tracing the development of language from its inception, lexical development must necessarily be a focus of study because the acquisition of words constitutes the child's initial achievement as a language user. A certain amount of vocabulary must be acquired before words can be combined into sentences, a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in vocabulary size appears as early as 16 months and exists even after controlling for mother-child interactions, suggesting a biological component in girls' advantage in reading and writing.

    “This difference appears as early as 16 months and exists even after controlling for mother -child interactions, suggesting a biological component in girls ' advantage in the areas of reading and writing (Huttenlocher et al., 1991).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Huttenlocher et al., 1991

  • Vocabulary size is typically larger among females than males.

    “For example, vocabulary size, which has a strong memory component, is typically larger among females than males.”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Huttenlocher et al., 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
1991-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
236-248
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2108449190
Cited by
1,783
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 71
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
vocabulary development, language input, mother-child speech, individual differences, gender differences, early childhood language learning, word learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review