Cited by 18Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentCareer Development and DiversityHigher Education Research Studies

Mentoring underrepresented students in speech-language pathology: Effects of didactic training, leadership development, and research engagement

Mahendra, Nidhi, Kashinath, Shubha·2022·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to implement and track the outcomes of a yearlong, structured mentoring program aimed at enhancing the retention and success of underrepresented graduate and undergraduate students in speech-language pathology. Method: Student participants were recruited following an open application process and based on meeting eligibility requirements and committing to program completion. The focus of this program was to provide didactic training on leadership development, culturally responsive practice, and research methods used in speech-language pathology. This program emphasized participant needs assessments and goal-setting, access to one-on-one and group mentoring by peers and professionals, and a culminating experience in which participant teams completed a supervised clinical research project or a community outreach and education project. Results: Forty-six participants in three cohorts completed the yearlong program in three consecutive years. Positive outcomes included program completion, degree completion, student perceptions of program benefit, completion of innovative community-engaged and research projects, and dissemination of scholarly work. Conclusion: Our findings from implementing this program and tracking its outcomes have implications for using innovative, equity-minded, and evidence-based strategies for retaining and mentoring minoritized students in speech-language pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mahendra and Kashinath (2022) described a structured mentoring program in California that targeted students interested in a career in speech-language pathology, and its outcomes showed significant improvements in students' academic performance, research skills, and leadership abilities.

    “Similarly, Mahendra and Kashinath (2022) described a structured mentoring program in California that targeted students interested in a career in speech-language pathology.The outcomes of this pathway program were positive, and showed significant improvements in students' academic performance, research skills, and leadership abilities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Mahendra, N., & Kashinath, S.
Affiliations
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • California State University, East Bay (US)
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2022-03-10
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
527-538
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W3208449538
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
mentoring, underrepresented students, speech-language pathology education, student retention, leadership development, culturally responsive practice, research engagement, community-engaged research
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Humans, Leadership, Mentors, Speech, Speech-Language Pathology, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review