Mentoring underrepresented students in speech-language pathology: Effects of didactic training, leadership development, and research engagement
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to implement and track the outcomes of a yearlong, structured mentoring program aimed at enhancing the retention and success of underrepresented graduate and undergraduate students in speech-language pathology. Method: Student participants were recruited following an open application process and based on meeting eligibility requirements and committing to program completion. The focus of this program was to provide didactic training on leadership development, culturally responsive practice, and research methods used in speech-language pathology. This program emphasized participant needs assessments and goal-setting, access to one-on-one and group mentoring by peers and professionals, and a culminating experience in which participant teams completed a supervised clinical research project or a community outreach and education project. Results: Forty-six participants in three cohorts completed the yearlong program in three consecutive years. Positive outcomes included program completion, degree completion, student perceptions of program benefit, completion of innovative community-engaged and research projects, and dissemination of scholarly work. Conclusion: Our findings from implementing this program and tracking its outcomes have implications for using innovative, equity-minded, and evidence-based strategies for retaining and mentoring minoritized students in speech-language pathology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mahendra and Kashinath (2022) described a structured mentoring program in California that targeted students interested in a career in speech-language pathology, and its outcomes showed significant improvements in students' academic performance, research skills, and leadership abilities.
“Similarly, Mahendra and Kashinath (2022) described a structured mentoring program in California that targeted students interested in a career in speech-language pathology.The outcomes of this pathway program were positive, and showed significant improvements in students' academic performance, research skills, and leadership abilities.”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Mahendra and Kashinath, 2022
Cites
Preparing minority scientists and engineers
Summers, M. F., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1125257 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mahendra, N., & Kashinath, S.
- Affiliations
- San Jose State University (US)
- California State University, East Bay (US)
- ORCID
- Mahendra, Nidhi
- Venue
- American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Published
- 2022-03-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 527-538
- ISSN
- 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9110
- OpenAlex
- W3208449538
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- mentoring, underrepresented students, speech-language pathology education, student retention, leadership development, culturally responsive practice, research engagement, community-engaged research
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Humans, Leadership, Mentors, Speech, Speech-Language Pathology, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review