Cited by 9Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Effectiveness of stuttering modification treatment in school-age children who stutter: A randomized clinical trial

Open access
Kohmäscher, Anke, Primaßin, Annika, Heiler, Sabrina, Avelar, Patricia Da Costa, Franken, Marie-Christine, Heim, Stefan·2023·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of the stuttering modification intervention Kinder Dürfen Stottern (KIDS) in school-age children who stutter. Method: Seventy-three children who stutter were included in this multicenter, two-group parallel, randomized, wait-list controlled trial with a follow-up of 12 months. Children aged 7–11 years were recruited from 34 centers for speech therapy and randomized to either the immediate-treatment group or the 3 months delayed-treatment group. KIDS was provided by 26 clinicians who followed a treatment manual. Although the primary outcome measure was the impact of stuttering (Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering–School-Age [OASES-S]), the secondary outcomes included objective and subjective data on stuttering severity. Results: At 3 months postrandomization, the mean score changes of the OASES-S differed significantly between the experimental ( n = 33) and control group ( n = 29; p = .026). Furthermore, treatment outcomes up to 12 months were analyzed ( n = 59), indicating large effects of time on the OASES-S score ( p < .001, partial η 2 = .324). This was paralleled by significant improvements in parental ratings and objective ratings (stuttering severity, frequency, and physical concomitants). Conclusions: The significant short-term treatment effects in the OASES-S are in line with the (initial) focus of KIDS on cognitive and affective aspects of stuttering. Over 12 months, these changes were maintained and accompanied by behavioral improvements. The results suggest that individual treatment with KIDS is an adequate treatment option for this age group. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24207864

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00224

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been little empirical research on therapies designed to address the emotional impact of stuttering, including anxiety, for child and adolescent treatment.

    “However, there has been little empirical research on therapies designed to address the emotional impact of stuttering, including anxiety, for child and adolescent treatment (Johnson et al., 2023b; Kohm ¨ ascher et al., 2023).”

    From Speaking face-to-face with a virtual avatar to reduce anxiety in students who stutter: Tool development and pilot study results. (2026) · cites this paper as Kohmäscher et al., 2023

    The Evidence Base section (p. 3) says little is known about treatment effectiveness for children aged 6–13 and notes a lack of randomized trials for that age group. It also describes a treatment aimed at reducing negative psychological reactions, but it does not establish a research gap specifically for anxiety-focused therapies or for adolescents. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohmäscher, A., Primaßin, A., Heiler, S., Avelar, P. D. C., Franken, M.-C., & Heim, S.
Affiliations
  • FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
2023-11-09
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
4191-4205
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W4387395701
Cited by
9
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
elementary school students, stuttering, stuttering severity, stuttering frequency, treatment effectiveness, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Quality of Life, Schools, Speech Therapy, Stuttering, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review