Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Procedure for Phonetic Transcription by Consensus

Shriberg, Lawrence D., Kwiatkowski, Joan, Hoffmann, Kit·1984·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

A consensus transcription procedure is presented, and representative data are reported. The procedure includes explicit response definitions for mapping narrow phonetic transcription onto dichotomous, nonerror/error scores and 17 rules for obtaining consensus between two transcribers. The data include descriptive statistics for consensus rule use based on over 18,000 sounds transcribed during a normative study of speech sound acquisition in children aged 3–6 years. Validity and reliability issues in phonetic transcription are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/jshr.2703.456

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Hoffmann, K.
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
1984-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
456-465
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W1974713650
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Procedure for Phonetic Transcription by Consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshr.2703.456
The paper
Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Hoffmann, K. (1984). A Procedure for Phonetic Transcription by Consensus. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2703.456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.