The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment Efficacy: Voice Disorders
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on the efficacy of treatment for voice disorders primarily using studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Voice disorders are defined, their frequency of occurrence across the life span is reported, and their impact on the lives of individuals with voice disorders is documented. The goal of voice treatment is to maximize vocal effectiveness given the existing disorder and to reduce the handicapping effect of the voice problem. Voice treatment may be (a) the preferred treatment to resolve the voice disorder when medical (surgical or pharmacological) treatments are not indicated; (b) the initial treatment in cases where medical treatment appears indicated; it may obviate the need for medical treatment; (c) completed before and after surgical treatment to maximize long-term post-surgical voice; and (d) a preventative treatment to preserve vocal health. Experimental and clinical data are reviewed that support these roles applied to various disorder types: (a) vocal misuse, hyperfunction and muscular imbalance (frequently resulting in edema, vocal nodules, polyps or contact ulcers); (b) medical or physical conditions (e.g., laryngeal nerve trauma, Parkinson disease); and (c) psychogenic disorders (e.g., conversion reactions, personality disorders). Directions for future research are suggested which maximize clinical outcomes and scientific rigor to enhance knowledge on the efficacy of voice treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
Roy, N., Bless, D. M., Heisey, D., & Ford, C. N. (1997) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80011-2 · Cited by 240
Robertson, S. J., & Thomson, F. (1984) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.3109/13682828409029837 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Occupational Safety and Health Aspects of Voice and Speech Professions
Vilkman, E. (2004) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000078344 · Cited by 393
Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update)
Stachler, R. J., Francis, D. O., Schwartz, S. R., Damask, C. C., Digoy, G. P., Krouse, H. J., McCoy, S. J., Ouellette, D. R., Patel, R. R., Reavis, C. (. W., et al. (2018) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599817751030 · Cited by 368
Roy, N. (2003) · Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1097/00020840-200306000-00002 · Cited by 217
Effects of loudness cues on respiration in individuals with Parkinson's disease
Sadagopan, N., & Huber, J. E. (2007) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.21375 · Cited by 58
Aghadoost, S., Jalaie, S., Dabirmoghaddam, P., & Khoddami, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.011 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramig, L. O., & Verdolini, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- S101-16
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1992761016
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment Efficacy: Voice Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jslhr.4101.s101
- The paper
- Ramig, L. O., & Verdolini, K. (1998). Treatment Efficacy: Voice Disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4101.s101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.