The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonword Repetition and Child Language Impairment
Abstract
A brief, processing-dependent, nonword repetition task, designed to minimize biases associated with traditional language tests, was investigated. In Study 1, no overlap in nonword repetition performance was found between a group of 20 school-age children enrolled in language intervention (LI) and a group of 20 age-matched peers developing language normally (LN). In Study 2, a comparison of likelihood ratios for the nonword repetition task and for a traditional language test revealed that nonword repetition distinguished between children independently identified as LI and LN with a high degree of accuracy, by contrast with the traditional language test. Nonword repetition may have considerable clinical utility as a screening measure for language impairment in children. Information on the likelihood ratios associated with all diagnostic tests of language is badly needed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“as for non-word repetition, the results were not sufficiently consistent across different studies, so it cannot be considered as an accurate diagnostic tool if used individually”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Citations
Cites
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,183
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3435 · Cited by 4,103
Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90004-j · Cited by 1,487
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315804682 · Cited by 1,111
Paradise, J. L., Rockette, H. E., Colborn, D. K., Bernard, B. S., Smith, C. G., Kurs‐Lasky, M., & Janosky, J. E. (1997) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.99.3.318 · Cited by 778
Daneman, M. (1994) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099403700409 · Cited by 763
Bishop, D., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01420.x · Cited by 693
Test of Nonverbal Intelligence
Brown, L. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_10 · Cited by 673
Selection of Children with Specific Language Deficits
Stark, R. E., & Tallal, P. A. (1981) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.4602.114 · Cited by 489
A System for the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., & Zhang, X. (1996) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3906.1284 · Cited by 429
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Akmajian A., 1995, Linguistics
- Dunn L., 1981, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised
- Edwards J. & Lahey M. (1996 June). Why do children with specific language impairment repeat nonwords less accurately than their peers? Poster session presented at the 17th Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders University of Wisconsin–Madison.
- Hammill D., 1988, Test of Language Development 2 Intermediate
- Kay Elemetrics Corporation, 1994, CSL: Computerized Speech Laboratory, Model 4300B
- Newcomer P., 1988, Test of Language Development 2 Primary
- Shriberg L. D., 1982, Clinical phonetics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developmental Dyslexia and Specific Language Impairment: Same or Different?
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858 · Cited by 1,356
An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups
Kjelgaard, M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. B. (2001) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960042000058 · Cited by 1,131
“North, & Donlan, 1996; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990).”
BackgroundMethodLanguage Deficits in Poor Comprehenders: A Case for the Simple View of Reading
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023 · Cited by 1,034
Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship
Gathercole, S. E. (2006) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716406060383 · Cited by 959
“Increased sensitivity to increasing length of nonwords has now been replicated in many samples of children with SLI (e.g., Archibald & Gathercole, in press-a; Bishop et al., 1996; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Marton & Schwartz, 2003; Montgomery, 1995a).”
BackgroundAre Specific Language Impairment and Dyslexia Distinct Disorders?
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. E. (2005) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Campbell, Thomas F.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1136-1146
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1986346898
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r29dc001858-05)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R29DC01858)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- non-word repetition, language impairment, children, language screening, likelihood ratios, language intervention, diagnostic test validity, language assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Male, Phonetics, Speech Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review