The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Verbal Working Memory and Sentence Comprehension in Children With Specific Language Impairment
Abstract
In this study we examined the influence of verbal working memory on sentence comprehension in children with SLI. Twelve children with SLI, 12 normally developing children matched for age (CA), and 12 children matched for receptive vocabulary (VM) completed two tasks. In the verbal working memory task, children recalled as many real words as possible under three processing load conditions (i.e., no-load condition; single-load condition, where words were recalled according to physical size of word referents; and dual-load condition, where words were recalled by semantic category and physical size of word referents). In the sentence comprehension task, children listened to linguistically nonredundant (shorter) and linguistically redundant (longer) sentences. Results of the memory task showed that the children with SLI recalled fewer words in the dual-load condition than their CA peers, who showed no condition effect. The SLI and VM groups performed similarly overall, but both groups showed poorer recall in the dual-load condition than in the other conditions. On the sentence comprehension task, children with SLI comprehended fewer sentences of both types than the CA children and fewer redundant sentences relative to themselves and to the VM children. Results were interpreted to suggest that children with SLI (a) have less functional verbal working memory capacity (i.e., ability to coordinate both storage and processing functions) than their CA peers and (b) have greater difficulty managing both their working memory abilities and general processing resources than both age peers and younger children when performing a "complex" off-line sentence processing task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Is Specific Language Impairment a valid diagnostic category? Genetic and psycholinguistic evidence
Bishop, D. V. M. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0134 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Short‐term and working memory in specific language impairment
Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/13682820500442602 · Cited by 553
Processing Limitations in Children With Specific Language Impairment: The Role of Executive Function
Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00976.x · Cited by 339
Laws, G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/103 · Cited by 293
Working memory and comprehension in children with specific language impairment: what we know so far
Montgomery, J. W. (2003) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00021-2 · Cited by 262
Self-citationLai, C. L. E., Lau, Z., Lui, S. S. Y., Lok, E., Tam, V., Chan, Q., Cheng, K. M., Lam, S. M., & Cheung, E. F. C. (2017) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1723 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Montgomery, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-308
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1963688142
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Verbal Working Memory and Sentence Comprehension in Children With Specific Language Impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jslhr.4302.293
- The paper
- Montgomery, J. W. (2000). Verbal Working Memory and Sentence Comprehension in Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4302.293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.