The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery
Abstract
Background: A combination of factors has emphasized the need to reduce postoperative stay after surgery. Multimodal care plans may shorten hospital stay, but have been associated with high readmission rates and are generally reserved for straightforward, non-complicated colonic (not rectal) resections. This study evaluated a ‘fast track’ protocol in patients undergoing major colonic and rectal surgery. Methods: Sixty consecutive patients (median age 44·5 (range 13–70) years) underwent major procedures over a 6-week period on one colorectal service. Nasogastric tubes and epidural anaesthesia were not used. Patients participated in a protocol of early diet and early ambulation, and were discharged after meeting defined criteria. Results: Fifty-eight patients (97 per cent) were deemed suitable for the ‘fast track’ approach at the time of surgery and stayed for a mean(s.d.) of 4·3(1·6) days after operation. Patients in diagnosis-related group (DRG) 148 (colorectal resection with co-morbidity; n = 40) stayed for 4·6(1·7) days, which was longer than those in DRG 149 (without co-morbidity; n = 18) who stayed 3·5(0·8) days (P = 0·01). Three patients (5 per cent) required a nasogastric tube for vomiting. There were no readmissions directly attributable to ‘fast track’ failure, although four patients (7 per cent) were readmitted within 30 days of operation for other reasons. Eight poorly compliant patients stayed for 5·1(1·1) days (P = 0·02 versus compliant patients). ‘Fast track’ patients had a shorter length of stay than patients receiving traditional care on other colorectal services during the same time period (compared by DRG 148, DRG 149 and for all patients) (P < 0·0001). Conclusion: The ‘fast track’ protocol allows patients with high levels of co-morbidity undergoing complex colorectal and reoperative pelvic surgery to benefit from a rapid recovery and early discharge from hospital. The approach is safe and has low readmission rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation
Kehlet, H. (1997) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/78.5.606 · Cited by 2,827
A Clinical Pathway to Accelerate Recovery After Colonic Resection
Basse, L., Hjort Jakobsen, D., Billesbølle, P., Werner, M., & Kehlet, H. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008 · Cited by 774
Bardram, L., Funch-Jensen, P., Jensen, P., Kehlet, H., & Crawford, M. E. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6 · Cited by 657
Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme
Kehlet, H., & Mogensen, T. (1999) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x · Cited by 577
Critical Pathways as a Strategy for Improving Care: Problems and Potential
Pearson, S. D., Goulart-Fisher, D., & Lee, T. H. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-12-199512150-00008 · Cited by 503
Is Early Oral Feeding Safe After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Trial
Reissman, P., Teoh, T.-A., Cohen, S. M., Weiss, E. G., Nogueras, J. J., & Wexner, S. D. (1995) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199507000-00012 · Cited by 402
Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission1
Taheri, P. A., Butz, D. A., & Greenfield, L. J. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00352-5 · Cited by 351
Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer
Bokey, E. L., Chapuis, P. H., Fung, C., Hughes, W. J., Koorey, S. G., Brewer, D., Newland, R. C., & Chiu, Y. S. Y. (1995) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02148847 · Cited by 315
Standardized Perioperative Care Protocols and Reduced Length of Stay After Colon Surgery
Bradshaw, B. G., Liu, S. S., & Thirlby, R. C. (1998) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00078-7 · Cited by 199
Must early postoperative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy?
Binderow, S. R., Cohen, S. M., Wexner, S. D., & Nogueras, J. J. (1994) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02050994 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Schwenk, W., Demartines, N., Roulin, D., Francis, N., McNaught, C. E., MacFie, J., Liberman, A. S., Soop, M., et al. (2013) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 · Cited by 1,082
Gustafsson, U. O. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.309 · Cited by 936
Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Self-citationA protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection
Maessen, J., Dejong, C. H. C., Hausel, J., Nygren, J., Lassen, K., Andersen, J., Kessels, A. G. H., Revhaug, A., Kehlet, H., Ljungqvist, O., et al. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5468 · Cited by 533
Behrns, K. E. (2012) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Delaney, C. P., Fazio, V. W., Senagore, A. J., Robinson, B., Halverson, A. L., & Remzi, F. H.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1533-1538
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2133075354
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01905.x
- The paper
- Delaney, C. P., Fazio, V. W., Senagore, A. J., Robinson, B., Halverson, A. L., & Remzi, F. H. (2001). ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01905.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.