The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Above‐ground biomass was measured at bog hummock, bog hollow and poor‐fen sites in Mer Bleue, a large, raised ombrotrophic bog near Ottawa, Ont., Canada. The average above‐ground biomass was 587 g m−2 in the bog, composed mainly of shrubs and Sphagnum capitula. In the poor fen, the average biomass was 317 g m−2, comprising mainly sedges and herbs and Sphagnum capitula. Vascular plant above‐ground biomass was greater where the water table was lower, with a similar but weaker relationship for Sphagnum capitula and vascular leaf biomass. Below‐ground biomass averaged 2400 g m−2 at the bog hummock site, of which 300 g m−2 was fine roots (< 2 mm diameter), compared with 1400 g m−2 in hollows (fine roots 450 g m−2) and 1200 g m−2 at the poor‐fen site. Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of CO 2 was measured in chambers and used to derive ecosystem respiration and photosynthesis. Under high light flux (PAR of 1500 µmol m−2 s−1), NEE ranged across sites from 0.08 to 0.22 mg m−2 s−1 (a positive value indicates ecosystem uptake) in the spring and summer, but fell to –0.01 to –0.13 mg m−2 s−1 (i.e. a release of CO 2) during a late‐summer dry period. There was a general agreement between a combination of literature estimates of photosynthetic capacity for shrubs and mosses and measured biomass and summer‐time CO 2 uptake determined by the eddy covariance technique within a bog footprint (0.40 and 0.35–0.40 mg m−2 s−1, respectively). Gross photosynthesis was estimated to be about 530 g m−2 year−1, total respiration 460 g m−2 year−1, and export of DOC, DIC and CH 4 10 g m−2 year−1, leaving an annual C sequestration rate of 60 g m−2 year−1. Root production and decomposition are important parts of the C budget of the bog. Root C production was estimated to be 161–176 g m−2 year−1, resulting in fractional turnover rates of 0.2 and 1 year−1 for total and fine roots, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Cited by
Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., & Hedmark, Å. (2010) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4 · Cited by 690
Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland
ROULET, N. T., LAFLEUR, P. M., RICHARD, P. J. H., MOORE, T. R., HUMPHREYS, E. R., & BUBIER, J. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x · Cited by 677
Self-citationCarbon cycling in peatlands A review of processes and controls
Blodau, C. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a02-004 · Cited by 400
Lamers, L. P. M., Vile, M. A., Grootjans, A. P., Acreman, M. C., van Diggelen, R., Evans, M. G., Richardson, C. J., Rochefort, L., Kooijman, A. M., Roelofs, J. G. M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12102 · Cited by 257
Effects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands
Zhong, Y., Jiang, M., & Middleton, B. A. (2020) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, T. R., Bubier, J. L., Frolking, S. E., Lafleur, P. M., & Roulet, N. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2164404137
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x
- The paper
- Moore, T. R., Bubier, J. L., Frolking, S. E., Lafleur, P. M., & Roulet, N. T. (2002). Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.