The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm
Abstract
To investigate the arrangement of biofilms formed in vivo, volunteers wore splints with slabs of six different dental materials inserted to collect smooth surface plaque. After 5 d of undisturbed plaque accumulation, the specimens were vital stained and analyzed by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to evaluate the percentage of vital biofilm microflora (VF percentage). Further parameters were the area of the specimens covered by plaque (surface coating; SC, %) and the height of the biofilms (BH, µ m). The metals amalgam and gold, the compomer, as well as the glass‐ionomer cement harboured an almost entirely dead biofilm (VF <8%). Resin composite led to vitality values between 4 and 21%, while a very thin biofilm on ceramic revealed the highest vitality values (34–86%). SC varied from 6% on glass‐ionomer cement to 100% on amalgam. BH reached its highest value on amalgam and gold of 17 and 11 µ m, respectively, while heights of between 1 and 6 µ m were found on the ceramic, resin composite, compomer and the glass‐ionomer cement. Within their limits, the present findings indicate that amalgam, gold, compomer and glass‐ionomer cement exert an influence against the adhering biofilm. No general relationship could be established between the different parameters VF percentage, SC percentage and BH (µ m).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condition
Silness, J., & Löe, H. (1964) · Acta Odontologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016356408993968 · Cited by 7,932
Confocal Microscopy Study of Undisturbed and Chlorhexidine-treated Dental Biofilm
Zaura-Arite, E., van Marle, J., & ten Cate, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345010800051001 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles
Aydin Sevinç, B., & Hanley, L. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31620 · Cited by 422
Aykent, F., Yondem, I., Ozyesil, A. G., Gunal, S. K., Avunduk, M. C., & Ozkan, S. (2010) · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(10)60034-0 · Cited by 276
Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications
Sterzenbach, T., Helbig, R., Hannig, C., & Hannig, M. (2020) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03646-1 · Cited by 212
Synthesis of methacrylate monomers with antibacterial effects against S. mutans
He, J., Söderling, E., Österblad, M., Vallittu, P. K., & Lassila, L. V. J. (2011) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules16119755 · Cited by 113
He, J., Söderling, E., Lassila, L. V. J., & Vallittu, P. K. (2015) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.007 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Auschill, T. M., Arweiler, N. B., Brecx, M., Reich, E., Sculean, A., & Netuschil, L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-53
- ISSN
- 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
- 0909-8836
- 1600-0722
- OpenAlex
- W2027174289
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x
- The paper
- Auschill, T. M., Arweiler, N. B., Brecx, M., Reich, E., Sculean, A., & Netuschil, L. (2002). The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. European Journal of Oral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.