Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm

Auschill, Thorsten Mathias, Arweiler, Nicole Birgit, Brecx, Michel, Reich, Elmar, Sculean, Anton, Netuschil, Lutz·2002·European Journal of Oral Sciences

Abstract

To investigate the arrangement of biofilms formed in vivo, volunteers wore splints with slabs of six different dental materials inserted to collect smooth surface plaque. After 5 d of undisturbed plaque accumulation, the specimens were vital stained and analyzed by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to evaluate the percentage of vital biofilm microflora (VF percentage). Further parameters were the area of the specimens covered by plaque (surface coating; SC, %) and the height of the biofilms (BH, µ m). The metals amalgam and gold, the compomer, as well as the glass‐ionomer cement harboured an almost entirely dead biofilm (VF <8%). Resin composite led to vitality values between 4 and 21%, while a very thin biofilm on ceramic revealed the highest vitality values (34–86%). SC varied from 6% on glass‐ionomer cement to 100% on amalgam. BH reached its highest value on amalgam and gold of 17 and 11 µ m, respectively, while heights of between 1 and 6 µ m were found on the ceramic, resin composite, compomer and the glass‐ionomer cement. Within their limits, the present findings indicate that amalgam, gold, compomer and glass‐ionomer cement exert an influence against the adhering biofilm. No general relationship could be established between the different parameters VF percentage, SC percentage and BH (µ m).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Auschill, T. M., Arweiler, N. B., Brecx, M., Reich, E., Sculean, A., & Netuschil, L.
Venue
European Journal of Oral Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
48-53
ISSN
  • 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
  • 0909-8836
  • 1600-0722
OpenAlex
W2027174289
Cited by
179
References
3
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x
The paper
Auschill, T. M., Arweiler, N. B., Brecx, M., Reich, E., Sculean, A., & Netuschil, L. (2002). The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. European Journal of Oral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.