Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VR1 protein expression increases in undamaged DRG neurons after partial nerve injury

Hudson, L. J., Bevan, S., Wotherspoon, G., Gentry, C., Fox, A., Winter, J.·2001·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Changes in phenotype or connectivity of primary afferent neurons following peripheral nerve injury may contribute to the hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with neuropathic pain conditions. Although earlier studies using partial nerve injury models have focused on the role of damaged fibres in the generation of ectopic discharges and pain, it is now thought that remaining undamaged fibres may be equally important. We have examined the expression of the sensory neuron‐specific cation channel Vanilloid Receptor 1 (VR1), an important transducer of noxious stimuli, in three models of nerve injury in the rat, using anatomical separation or fluorescent retrograde tracers to identify damaged or undamaged sensory neurons. After total or partial sciatic nerve transection, or spinal nerve ligation, VR1‐immunoreactivity (IR) was significantly reduced in the somata of all damaged dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuronal profiles, compared to controls. However, after partial transection or spinal nerve ligation, VR1 expression was greater in the undamaged DRG somata than in controls. Unexpectedly, after L5 spinal nerve ligation, VR1‐IR of the A‐fibre somata increased ≈ 3‐fold in the uninjured L4 DRG compared to controls; a much greater increase than seen in the somata with C‐fibres. Furthermore, we found that VR1‐IR persisted in the transected sciatic nerve proximal to the lesion, despite its down‐regulation in the damaged neuronal somata. This persistence in the nerve proximal to the lesion after nerve section, together with increased VR1 in DRG neurons left undamaged after partial nerve injury, may be crucial to the development or maintenance of neuropathic pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01591.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Hudson, L. J., Bevan, S., Wotherspoon, G., Gentry, C., Fox, A., & Winter, J.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
2105-2114
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2006132476
Cited by
389
References
4
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VR1 protein expression increases in undamaged DRG neurons after partial nerve injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01591.x
The paper
Hudson, L. J., Bevan, S., Wotherspoon, G., Gentry, C., Fox, A., & Winter, J. (2001). VR1 protein expression increases in undamaged DRG neurons after partial nerve injury. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01591.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.