The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive‐behavioural interventions among regular users of amphetamine
Abstract
Aims. To identify whether brief cognitive‐behavioural interventions are feasible among regular users of amphetamine, to assess the effectiveness of intervention overall and to pilot two‐ and four‐session interventions. Design. Subjects were assigned randomly to individually receive a cognitive‐behavioural intervention ( n = 32) of either two or four sessions' duration or a self‐help booklet (control condition; n = 32). Setting. Subjects were volunteers recruited from needle exchange schemes and treatment centres in Newcastle, Australia. Participants. Regular (at least monthly) users of amphetamine were recruited. Intervention. Either four sessions of cognitive‐behaviour therapy, consisting of a motivational interview and skills training in avoidance of high‐risk situations, coping with craving and relapse prevention, or two sessions consisting of a motivational interview and discussion of skills. Measurements. The Opiate Treatment Index was the main measure at pre‐treatment and 6‐month follow‐up. Findings. There was a significant reduction in amphetamine use among the sample as a whole, with inconclusive differences between intervention subgroups. There was a moderate overall intervention effect, with the intervention group reporting over twice the reduction in daily amphetamine use as the control group. Significantly more people in the cognitive‐behavioural intervention condition abstained from amphetamine at 6‐month follow‐up compared to the control condition. Conclusion. Brief cognitive‐behavioural interventions appear feasible among regular users of amphetamine. A larger randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of such interventions appears warranted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RP has been disseminated for treatment of several types of substance abuse (8–12) with considerable empirical support (13–20).”
From Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Efficacy Trial (2009) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700021644 · Cited by 5,639
(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,438
Gossop, M., Darke, S. G., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W., & Strang, J. (1995) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9056072.x · Cited by 1,341
The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation.
Biener, L., & Abrams, D. B. (1991) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.360 · Cited by 1,111
Darke, S., Hall, W., Wodak, A., Heather, N., & Ward, J. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02719.x · Cited by 485
Darke, S. G., Hall, W., Heather, N., Ward, J., & WODAK, A. D. (1991) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/00002030-199102000-00008 · Cited by 270
Hando, J., Topp, L., & Hall, W. (1997) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00051-3 · Cited by 101
Gossop, M., Marsden, J., & Stewart, D. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 53
Characteristics of regular amphetamine users and implications for treatment
Baker, A., Boggs, T. G., & Lewin, T. J. (2001) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230123756 · Cited by 31
Self-citationAmphetamine Users in Treatment: Factors Associated with Sustained Abstinence from Street Drugs
Klee, H., Wright, S., & Morris, J. (1999) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.3109/16066359909004386 · Cited by 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kirk, J. M. W., MacDonald, A., Lavender, P., Dean, J. M., & Rubin, G. (2017) · Biomedicine Hub · doi:10.1159/000480347 · Cited by 3,902
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rubak, S., Sandbæk, A., Lauritzen, T., & Christensen, B. (2005) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,841
Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.
Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.862 · Cited by 729
Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Efficacy Trial
Bowen, S., Chawla, N., Collins, S. E., Witkiewitz, K., Hsu, S., Grow, J., Clifasefi, S., Garner, M., Douglass, A., Larimer, M. E., et al. (2009) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897070903250084 · Cited by 715
Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Clifasefi, S. L., Grow, J., Chawla, N., Hsu, S. H., Carroll, H. A., Harrop, E., Collins, S. E., Lustyk, M. K., et al. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4546 · Cited by 701
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, A., Boggs, T. G., & Lewin, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1279-1287
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2100835521
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- amphetamine use, cognitive-behavioural intervention, brief intervention, motivational interviewing, craving, relapse prevention, self-help booklet, needle exchange programs, treatment centers, drug use reduction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, New South Wales, Patient Participation, Psychotherapy, Brief, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Amphetamine-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
