Cited by 701Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Relative Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention, Standard Relapse Prevention, and Treatment as Usual for Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Bowen, Sarah, Witkiewitz, Katie, Clifasefi, Seema L., Grow, Joel, Chawla, Neharika, Hsu, Sharon H., Carroll, Haley A., Harrop, Erin +3 more·2014·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Relapse is highly prevalent following substance abuse treatments, highlighting the need for improved aftercare interventions. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP), a group-based psychosocial aftercare, integrates evidence-based practices from mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive-behavioral relapse prevention (RP) approaches. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of MBRP in reducing relapse compared with RP and treatment as usual (TAU [12-step programming and psychoeducation]) during a 12-month follow-up period. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between October 2009 and July 2012, a total of 286 eligible individuals who successfully completed initial treatment for substance use disorders at a private, nonprofit treatment facility were randomized to MBRP, RP, or TAU aftercare and monitored for 12 months. Participants medically cleared for continuing care were aged 18 to 70 years; 71.5% were male and 42.1% were of ethnic/racial minority. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to 8 weekly group sessions of MBRP, cognitive-behavioral RP, or TAU. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes included relapse to drug use and heavy drinking as well as frequency of substance use in the past 90 days. Variables were assessed at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points. Measures used included self-report of relapse and urinalysis drug and alcohol screenings. RESULTS: Compared with TAU, participants assigned to MBRP and RP reported significantly lower risk of relapse to substance use and heavy drinking and, among those who used substances, significantly fewer days of substance use and heavy drinking at the 6-month follow-up. Cognitive-behavioral RP showed an advantage over MBRP in time to first drug use. At the 12-month follow-up, MBRP participants reported significantly fewer days of substance use and significantly decreased heavy drinking compared with RP and TAU. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For individuals in aftercare following initial treatment for substance use disorders, RP and MBRP, compared with TAU, produced significantly reduced relapse risk to drug use and heavy drinking. Relapse prevention delayed time to first drug use at 6-month follow-up, with MBRP and RP participants who used alcohol also reporting significantly fewer heavy drinking days compared with TAU participants. At 12-month follow-up, MBRP offered added benefit over RP and TAU in reducing drug use and heavy drinking. Targeted mindfulness practices may support long-term outcomes by strengthening the ability to monitor and skillfully cope with discomfort associated with craving or negative affect, thus supporting long-term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01159535

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4546

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The trial was originally designed to evaluate effectiveness and required 64 participants per group for 80% power, but was revised to a pilot design with 40 participants per group due to recruitment challenges during COVID-19.

    “A fully powered trial with 80% power and a two‐sided α of 0.05 would require 64 participants per group. However, because of recruitment challenges during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the study was revised to a pilot design, with feasibility and acceptability as the primary outcomes.”

    From The feasibility of mindfulness‐based relapse prevention for adults with substance use disorders (illicit drugs) in a Chinese population: A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Methods > Participants passage (page not provided) says this trial ran from October 2009 to July 2012 and enrolled 286 participants, contrary to the claim that COVID-19 recruitment challenges led to a 40-per-group pilot. The searched passages contain no 64-per-group power calculation. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence suggests that the effects of mindfulness meditation training, if a mindfulness practice is established, may last longer than cognitive behavioral treatment.

    “There is evidence to suggest that the effects of mindfulness meditation training, if a mindfulness practice is established, may last longer than cognitive behavioral treatment (Bowen et al., 2014).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention in a Jail Drug Treatment Program. (2019) · cites this paper as Bowen et al., 2014

    The Discussion (page not provided) says mindfulness-based relapse prevention may have a more enduring effect than standard relapse prevention; at 12 months, participants reported fewer drug-use days and a higher probability of avoiding heavy drinking. It also proposes that continued practice could support long-term outcomes, but does not establish that the advantage depends on participants having established a mindfulness practice. The finding concerns substance-use-disorder aftercare, not mindfulness meditation training generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When people use experiential avoidance to manage psychiatric symptoms, a pattern of increasing emotional dysregulation may result, which among those with OUD generally leads to urges for or use of opioids or other substances for relief.

    “When people employ experiential avoidance to manage symptoms of anxiety, panic, depression, trauma, or other psychiatric symptoms, a similar pattern of increasing emotional dysregulation may result, which among those with OUD generally leads to urges for or use of opioids or other substances (e.g. benzodiazepines) for relief 11,22,48.”

    From Effects of a trauma-informed mindful recovery program on comorbid pain, anxiety, and substance use during primary care buprenorphine treatment: A proof-of-concept study (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    The paper’s Mindfulness-Based Treatment section links negative affect and craving to relapse and describes an urgency to alleviate discomfort through substance use. Its discussion of avoiding affective discomfort also supports the general premise. It does not establish an escalating pattern of emotional dysregulation caused by experiential avoidance, or show that this generally leads people with OUD to seek opioids or benzodiazepines for relief; its findings concern substance use disorders more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interventions which incorporate aspects of mindfulness are effective in reducing alcohol and cannabis use in subclinical and clinical populations.

    “A review of the literature shows that interventions which incorporate aspects of mindfulness, such as mindfulness-based relapse prevention or mindfulness meditation, are effective in reducing alcohol and cannabis use in subclinical (de Dios et al., 2012; Vinci et al., 2014) and clinical populations (Bowen et al., 2014; Enkema & Bowen, 2017; von Hammerstein et al., 2019).”

    From Examining the Prospective Associations Between Mindfulness Facets and Substance Use in Emerging Adulthood. (2021) · cites this paper as Bowen et al., 2014

    The Results (Generalized Linear Models; page not provided) report reduced heavy drinking and overall drug-use days with mindfulness-based relapse prevention among people receiving aftercare for substance use disorders. The paper does not report a cannabis-specific reduction; the subclinical-population claim is attached to other citations, not Bowen et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated promise for supporting recovery and improving mental health for persons with substance use conditions.

    “Mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated promise for supporting recovery and improving mental health for persons with substance use conditions (e.g. Refs. [11–21]).”

    From Mindful moms: acceptability and impact of co-designed and digitally delivered video meditations for pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (Generalized Linear Models) report reduced substance use and heavy drinking with mindfulness-based relapse prevention, supporting the recovery portion of the claim. The Mindfulness-Based Treatment section discusses reductions in anxiety and depressive relapse with mindfulness training generally, but this study did not establish improved mental health among its participants with substance use disorders. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Daley DC Marlatt GA Overcoming Your Alcohol or Drug Problem: Effective Recovery Strategies: Therapist Guide 2 New York, NY Oxford University Press 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Clifasefi, S. L., Grow, J., Chawla, N., Hsu, S. H., Carroll, H. A., Harrop, E., Collins, S. E., Lustyk, M. K., & Larimer, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Seattle Pacific University (US)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
547
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119144746
Cited by
701
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
42.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002319)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA019608, F31AA023126, AA 019608-03, K01AA021147)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K18DA031464, R21DA019562, R01DA025764)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025014)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness-based relapse prevention, substance use disorders, relapse prevention, usual care, 12-step programs, heavy drinking, drug use, relapse risk, group therapy, long-term follow-up, substance use frequency, alcohol consumption, treatment retention, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcoholism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review