Cited by 715Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Efficacy Trial

Open access
Bowen, Sarah, Chawla, Neharika, Collins, Susan E., Witkiewitz, Katie, Hsu, Sharon, Grow, Joel, Clifasefi, Seema, Garner, Michelle +3 more·2009·Substance Abuse

Abstract

The current study is the first randomized-controlled trial evaluating the feasibility and initial efficacy of an 8-week outpatient Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) program as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Participants were 168 adults with substance use disorders who had recently completed intensive inpatient or outpatient treatment. Assessments were administered pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 2 and 4 months post-intervention. Feasibility of MBRP was demonstrated by consistent homework compliance, attendance, and participant satisfaction. Initial efficacy was supported by significantly lower rates of substance use in those who received MBRP as compared to those in TAU over the 4-month post-intervention period. Additionally, MBRP participants demonstrated greater decreases in craving, and increases in acceptance and acting with awareness as compared to TAU. Results from this initial trial support the feasibility and initial efficacy of MBRP as an aftercare approach for individuals who have recently completed an intensive treatment for substance use disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08897070903250084

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The overall model for substance-use problems was significant.

    “The omnibus model for substance-use problems (Wald χ2 (7, N = 163) = 135.14, P <.001) was significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A significant time by treatment interaction indicated that alcohol or drug use decreased more among MBRP participants than among TAU participants.

    “The significant main effects for t were qualified by a significant t × Treatment interaction, which indicated that AOD use decreased to a greater extent among MBRP versus TAU participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The statistical model for alcohol or drug use days was significant.

    “The AOD use model was statistically significant (Wald χ2 (7, N = 163) = 97.72,P <.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 2 months post-intervention, MBRP participants reported an average of 2.1 days of use, while TAU participants reported an average of 5.4 days.

    “Two months post-intervention, MBRP participants reported an average of 2.1 days of use, and TAU participants reported an average of 5.4 days (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A significant time by treatment interaction suggested that acting with awareness increased more among MBRP participants than among TAU participants, for whom it decreased.

    “The significant main effects for t were qualified by a significant t × Treatment interaction, suggesting that acting with awareness increased to a greater extent among MBRP versus TAU participants, for whom it decreased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no significant treatment interactions or main effects of treatment on substance-use problems.

    “There were no significant treatment interactions or main effects of treatment on substance use problems (P > .68).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A significant quadratic time by treatment interaction indicated a curvilinear treatment effect, suggesting that MBRP treatment gains relative to TAU decayed by 4 months post-intervention.

    “The significant t2 × Treatment interaction also indicated a curvilinear effect of treatment on AOD use, which suggested that the treatment gains made by MBRP participants, compared to TAU participants, decayed by 4 months post-intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many therapeutic approaches use mindfulness techniques, and evidence of their benefits is growing.

    “Many therapeutic orientations, such as Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) (23) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for depression (MBCT) (24), use mindfulness techniques and practices, leading to growing evidence of its benefits (24–30).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In many developed countries, 12-step or mutual support groups are the most commonly available treatments.

    “The most commonly available treatments in many developed countries are 12-step or mutual support groups (4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    12-step approaches may not be clinically suitable for people who reject the disease model of addiction or whose spiritual beliefs or lifestyle conflict with 12-step philosophy.

    “however, these approaches may not be clinically indicated for individuals adverse to the disease model of addiction (6) or whose spiritual beliefs and/or lifestyle are in conflict with the 12-step philosophy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Adding further effective treatment components may improve the effects of Relapse Prevention.

    “Integration of further efficacious treatment components may enhance RP treatment effects (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Taking part in 12-step programs is linked to higher rates of abstinence.

    “Participation in 12-step programs is associated with greater abstinence (5)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Substance use disorders are frequently characterized as chronic conditions with relapses.

    “substance use disorders are often described as “chronic relapsing conditions” (2,3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Relapse Prevention has been used for several types of substance abuse and has considerable empirical support.

    “RP has been disseminated for treatment of several types of substance abuse (8–12) with considerable empirical support (13–20).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Relapse continues to be a significant problem for 44% to 70% of clients.

    “relapse remains a significant problem for 44% to 70% of clients (21).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Gender, ethnicity, and severity of initial substance use were examined as potential covariates and moderators but were not significant and were excluded from final models.

    “Other sociodemographic variables, including gender, ethnicity, and severity of initial substance use, were examined in primary analyses as potential covariates and moderators of the treatment effects. None were significant (all P > .05), and they were not included in final models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    About 61%, 57%, and 73% of the sample completed the post-intervention, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments, respectively.

    “Approximately 61%, 57%, and 73% of the sample (N = 168) completed post-intervention and 2-month and 4-month follow-up assessments, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    MBRP participants reported attending an average of 5.2 sessions, or 65% of treatment sessions.

    “MBRP participants reported attending 5.2 (2.4) or 65% of treatment sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire had an internal consistency of .68 in the current study.

    “Its internal consistency in the current study was .68.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maximum likelihood estimation is less biased and more precise for handling missing data than traditional imputation methods such as assuming use for missing observations or carrying the last observation forward.

    “recent simulation studies have shown that the estimation method employed in this study (i.e., maximum likelihood estimation) is less biased and more precise in dealing with missing data than traditional data imputation methods, such as assuming use for missing observations (intent-to-treat methods) or carrying the last observation forward (56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Timeline Followback has shown good reliability and validity when administered online and in person.

    “The TLFB has demonstrated good reliability and validity with both online and in-person administration (42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    54% of MBRP participants reported continued meditation practice at 4 months post-intervention, averaging 4.7 days per week and 29.9 minutes per session.

    “54% reported continued practice at 4 months post-intervention for an average of 4.7 ± 4.0 days/week and 29.9 ± 19.5 minutes per session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Short Inventory of Problems had an internal consistency of .96 in the current study.

    “internal consistency in the current study was .96.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire had an internal consistency of .91 in the current study, with subscale alphas from .80 to .87.

    “Internal consistency in the current study was .91, with subscale alphas ranging from .80 to .87.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study results support the feasibility and initial efficacy of MBRP and provide empirical support for MBRP as an alternative to standard 12-step-based or related aftercare programs.

    “Results of the current study provide evidence for the feasibility and initial efficacy of MBRP, offering empirical support for MBRP as an alternative to standard-of-care 12-step-based or related aftercare programs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The SCID-I has shown reliability and validity in settings like the one used in this study.

    “The SCID-I has demonstrated reliability and validity in such settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Attrition did not differ significantly between groups at any time point, and model predictors were not significantly associated with missing data on dependent variables.

    “Attrition did not significantly differ between groups at any time point and the predictors in each model were not significantly associated with missing data on dependent variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This randomized controlled trial shows empirical promise for the feasibility and initial efficacy of MBRP as an aftercare treatment for substance use disorders and provides preliminary support for the theoretical framework behind mindfulness meditation as a therapy for addictive behaviors.

    “In conclusion, this RCT demonstrates empirical promise for feasibility and initial efficacy of MBRP as an aftercare treatment for substance use disorders, and provides preliminary support for the theoretical framework behind mindfulness meditation as a therapy for addictive behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 260 screened participants, 187 were eligible, 9 declined, 9 did not complete baseline, and 1 refused randomization, leaving a final sample of 168.

    “Of screened participants (N = 260), 187 met eligibility criteria. Nine declined participation, 9 failed to complete the baseline assessment, and 1 refused randomization, reducing the overall sample to 168.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants rated the MBRP course as highly important and reported a high likelihood of continuing formal and informal meditation practices.

    “participants rated the MBRP course as highly important (8.3 ± 1.4) and reported a high likelihood of continuing formal (8.9 ± 1.2) and informal (8.9 ± 1.7) meditation practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale had an internal consistency of .87 in the current sample.

    “Its internal consistency in the current sample was .87.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned to MBRP or TAU using a computerized random number generator.

    “participants were randomly assigned, using a computerized random number generator, to either 8 weeks of MBRP or continuation of their existing TAU.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Total treatment hours were used as a covariate in all primary analyses.

    “Total number of treatment hours was therefore used as a covariate in all primary analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Race was included as a covariate in all analyses to control for the baseline racial difference.

    “To control for this baseline difference, race was used as a covariate in all analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The current trial is the first randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a mindfulness-based intervention for substance use disorders and relapse prevention.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first RCT evaluating the efficacy of a mindfulness-based intervention for substance use disorders and the prevention of relapse.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An obstacle in MBRP is low adherence rates, with outpatient therapy having a compliance rate of 50%-60% compared to 70% for relapse prevention.

    “An obstacle in MBRP is low adherence rates, with outpatient therapy having a compliance rate of 50%–60% compared to 70% for relapse prevention. 27”

    From Enhancing Emotion Regulation and Overcoming Craving in Alcohol Dependence Syndrome Through Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion describes MBRP participant compliance as good, not as an obstacle. The Results (Treatment Compliance, Attrition, and Satisfaction) report 65% MBRP session attendance and say comparison-group attendance rates were unavailable. The Introduction’s figure of up to 70% refers to relapse among clients, not compliance with relapse prevention. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pilot trials comparing an 8-week Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention Program to treatment as usual have found significant decreases in stress, craving, and substance use, with similar effects after cultural adaptation.

    “Pilot trials comparing an 8-week Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention Program (MBRP) to TAU have found significant decreases in stress, craving, and substance use, with similar effects after cultural adaptation for ethnically and racially diverse populations 20,21.”

    From Effects of a trauma-informed mindful recovery program on comorbid pain, anxiety, and substance use during primary care buprenorphine treatment: A proof-of-concept study (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Methods (Treatment) describe an eight-week MBRP program, and the Discussion reports significant improvements versus treatment as usual in substance-use days and craving. The paper describes an ethnically diverse sample, but our copy does not report a significant decrease in stress or test a culturally adapted MBRP program. The cultural-adaptation result therefore cannot be attributed to this trial. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among smokers in treatment, the average number of sessions attended is 5.2, even when eight sessions are available.

    “The length of treatment in the current protocol corresponds well to the mean number of sessions [5.2] attended by smokers in treatment, even when eight sessions are offered (Bowen et al., 2009).”

    From A randomized controlled trial protocol for engaging distress tolerance and working memory to aid smoking cessation in low socioeconomic status (SES) adults (2020) · cites this paper as Bowen et al., 2009

    The Results section (Treatment Compliance, Attrition, and Satisfaction; page unavailable) reports that MBRP participants attended an average of 5.2 sessions, and Methods (Treatment; page unavailable) specifies eight weekly sessions. But Methods (Participants; page unavailable) describes people treated for alcohol and drug use disorders, not a sample of smokers in treatment. The figure therefore does not establish average attendance among smokers. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The six-session treatment length matches well the average number of sessions smokers attend in treatment.

    “The length of treatment in the current protocol corresponds well to the mean number of sessions [5.2] attended by smokers in treatment, even when eight sessions are offered (Bowen et al., 2009).”

    From A randomized controlled trial protocol for engaging distress tolerance and working memory to aid smoking cessation in low socioeconomic status (SES) adults (2020) · cites this paper as Bowen et al., 2009

    The Results section (Treatment Compliance, Attrition, and Satisfaction; page unavailable) reports a mean attendance of 5.2 sessions, and Methods (Treatment; page unavailable) says eight sessions were offered. But the Participants section describes people treated for alcohol and drug use disorders, not a sample of smokers; the source does not establish average attendance among smokers in treatment. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Over the course of treatment, MBRP evinced fewer days of use compared to TAU (MBRP: M = .06 days, TAU: M = 2.57 days).

    “Over the course of treatment, MBRP evinced fewer days of use compared to TAU (MBRP: M = .06 days, TAU: M = 2.57 days).”

    From Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors (2011) · cites this paper as [117]

    The Results (Primary Outcomes; page unavailable) report that days of alcohol or drug use decreased more in the MBRP group than in the TAU group. The passages available from our copy do not give the claimed means of 0.06 and 2.57 days; they report 2.1 and 5.4 days, respectively, at two months post-intervention. The Discussion also notes that the difference diminished by four months. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 5.51reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .019

    “χ2 (1, N = 168) = 5.51, p = .02”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 0.631reported p = .43 · recomputed p = .427

    “χ2 (1, N = 93) = .631, p = .43”

  • Consistentχ²(7) = 97.72reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ2 (7, N = 163) = 97.72,p < .001”

  • Consistentχ²(7) = 135.14reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ2 (7, N = 163) = 135.14, p < .001”

  • Consistentχ²(7) = 37.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ2 (7, N = 166) = 37.60, p < .001”

  • Consistentχ²(7) = 16.25reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .023

    “χ2 (7,N = 163) = 16.25, p = .02”

  • Consistentχ²(7) = 13.03reported p = .07 · recomputed p = .071

    “χ2 (7, N = 165) = 13.03, p = .07”

7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Overall White percentage conflicts with the treatment-group percentages

    Minor

    The paper reports 93 MBRP participants out of 168, leaving 75 in TAU. If 63% of MBRP and 45% of TAU participants were White, the overall proportion would be about 55%, not 51.8%; rounding cannot explain the gap.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kabat-Zinn J, 2002, Guided Mindfulness Meditation [audio CD]
  2. Gorski T T, 2007, The Gorski-Cenaps Model for Recovery and Relapse Prevention
  3. Holzel B K, 2008, Scan, 3, 55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowen, S., Chawla, N., Collins, S. E., Witkiewitz, K., Hsu, S., Grow, J., Clifasefi, S., Garner, M., Douglass, A., Larimer, M. E., & Marlatt, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
Corresponding author
Bowen, Sarah
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2009-10
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
295-305
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W2091260500
Cited by
715
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 35
FWCI
16.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA010562, R21DA019562)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness-based relapse prevention, substance use disorders, follow-up care, relapse prevention, craving, acceptance, acting with awareness, usual care, outpatient care, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Meditation, Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review